One Step is Enough.
The recent development and exploration of mixed metainferential logics is a breakthrough in our understanding of nontransitive and nonreflexive logics. Moreover, this exploration poses a new challenge to theorists like me, who have appealed to similarities to classical logic in defending the logic S...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Philosophical Logic Vol. 51; no. 6; pp. 1233 - 1260 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=161208514&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 161208514 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00223611 JPH jtl: Journal of Philosophical Logic issn: 00223611 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2022 vid: 51 iid: 6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 161208514 10.1007/s10992-021-09615-7 ppf: 1233 ppct: 27 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.1MB tig: atl: One Step is Enough. aug: au: Ripley, David affil: Philosophy Department SOPHIS Building 11, Monash University, 3800, Clayton, VIC, Australia su: Logic Adventure & adventurers Theorists sug: subj: Logic Adventure & adventurers Theorists keyword: Metainferences Nontransitive Paradox ab: The recent development and exploration of mixed metainferential logics is a breakthrough in our understanding of nontransitive and nonreflexive logics. Moreover, this exploration poses a new challenge to theorists like me, who have appealed to similarities to classical logic in defending the logic ST, since some mixed metainferential logics seem to bear even more similarities to classical logic than ST does. There is a whole ST-based hierarchy, of which ST itself is only the first step, that seems to become more and more classical at each level. I think this seeming is misleading: for certain purposes, anyhow, metainferential hierarchies give us no reason to move on from ST. ST is indeed only the first step on a grand metainferential adventure; but one step is enough. This paper aims to explain and defend that claim. Along the way, I take the opportunity also to develop some formal tools and results for thinking about metainferential logics more generally. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Journal of Philosophical Logic is a copyright of Springer, 2022. All Rights Reserved. item: Journal of Philosophical Logic holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|