IMPROVING CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING BY DIFFERENTIATING THE FUNCTIONS OF CONCEPTS.

The leading assumption of this paper is that we can improve the methodology of conceptual engineering if we differentiate between the different functions of our concepts. There is a growing body of research that emphasizes the revisionist virtues of conceptual engineering against the descriptive tas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Logos & Episteme Vol. 13; no. 4; pp. 359 - 380
Autor principal: MIRANDA VILCHIS, Rogelio
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Logos & Episteme 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=161372871&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 161372871
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        20690533
        ESYG
      jtl: Logos & Episteme
      issn: 20690533
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2022
      vid: 13
      iid: 4
      pid: 75611
      pub: Logos & Episteme
    artinfo:
      ui:
        161372871
        10.5840/logos-episteme202213431
      ppf: 359
      ppct: 21
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: IMPROVING CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING BY DIFFERENTIATING THE FUNCTIONS OF CONCEPTS.
      aug:
        au: MIRANDA VILCHIS, Rogelio
      su:
        Task analysis
        Engineering
        Philosophers
      sug:
        subj:
          Task analysis
          Engineering
          Philosophers
      keyword:
        concepts
        conceptual engineering
        emotion concepts
        functions
        metaphilosophy
      ab: The leading assumption of this paper is that we can improve the methodology of conceptual engineering if we differentiate between the different functions of our concepts. There is a growing body of research that emphasizes the revisionist virtues of conceptual engineering against the descriptive task of conceptual analysis. Yet, it also has faced severe critiques. Among the difficulties raised are the problems of conceptual identification and continuity. That is why several philosophers are trying to resolve these problems and improve the methodology by calling attention, for example, to the functions that concepts can play. I follow this line of argument and argue that we can increase the chances of success if we also clarify and differentiate them. Identifying and assessing the relationship between functions will help us avoid confusion, inconsistencies, and possible verbal disputes. Doing this not only serves our theoretical and practical purposes but helps us reconsider the potentialities and limits of the conceptual engineering program.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N