Alignment of patient‐centredness definitions with real‐life patient and clinician experiences: A qualitative study.

Introduction: Patient‐centred care (PCC) has come to the forefront for many institutions, funding agencies and clinicians, and is integrated into care. Does a disconnect in understanding still exist between patients, healthcare organizations and clinicians in what PCC means and how outstanding issue...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health Expectations Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 419 - 429
Main Authors: Babione, Julie, Panjwani, Dilshaan, Murphy, Sydney, Kelly, Jenny, Van Dyke, Jessica, Santana, Maria, Kaufman, Jaime, Sargious, Peter, Rabi, Doreen
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2023
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=161472446&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 161472446
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2023
      vid: 26
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        161472446
        160611168
        161472446
        161472446
        10.1111/hex.13674
        161472446
      ppf: 419
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Alignment of patient‐centredness definitions with real‐life patient and clinician experiences: A qualitative study.
      aug:
        au:
          Babione, Julie
          Panjwani, Dilshaan
          Murphy, Sydney
          Kelly, Jenny
          Van Dyke, Jessica
          Santana, Maria
          Kaufman, Jaime
          Sargious, Peter
          Rabi, Doreen
        affil: Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary Alberta,, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Patient Centered Care
          Patient Attitudes
          Attitude of Health Personnel
          Chronic Disease
          Consumer Participation
          Empowerment
          Physician-Patient Relations
          Human
          Qualitative Studies
          Thematic Analysis
          Secondary Analysis
          Focus Groups
          Patient Education
          Decision Making, Shared
          Health Care Delivery, Integrated
          Funding Source
      ab: Introduction: Patient‐centred care (PCC) has come to the forefront for many institutions, funding agencies and clinicians, and is integrated into care. Does a disconnect in understanding still exist between patients, healthcare organizations and clinicians in what PCC means and how outstanding issues might be addressed? Methods: We conducted interviews and focus groups with self‐reported chronic care patients and clinicians providing care to these patients exploring PCC experiences, expectations and practices. These data were initially analysed using inductive thematic analysis. This paper reports on the findings of a secondary analysis examining the alignment between patients and clinicians on five key predetermined dimensions of PCC. Results: Eighteen patients participated, representing a range of chronic conditions. Thirty‐eight clinicians participated. One thousand and three hundred patient and 1800 clinician codes were identified and grouped into 5 main topics with 140 unique themes (patients) and 9 main topics with 54 unique themes (clinicians). A total of 166 quotes (patient = 93, clinician = 73) were identified for this PCC definition alignment analysis. Partial or complete alignment of patient and clinician perspectives was seen on most dimensions. Key disconnects were observed in patient involvement, patient empowerment and clinician–patient communication. Only 18% of patients reported experiencing patient‐centred communication, whereas 57% of clinicians reported using patient‐focused communication approaches. Conclusion: Overall, study patients and clinicians endorse that many PCC elements occur. This study highlights key differences between patients and clinicians, suggesting persistent challenges. Clinician participants relayed their PCC approaches of informing and educating patients; however, patients often perceive these approaches as didactic, role‐diminishing and noncollaborative. Collaborative approaches, such as shared decision‐making, hold promise to bridge persistent PCC gaps and should be integrated into medical education programmes. Patient or Public Contribution: This project was conceived and executed with a co‐design approach wherein patients with chronic conditions who are trained in research (i.e., see descriptions of Patient and Community Engagement Research in the text) were involved in all stages of the research project alongside other researchers on the project team. Healthcare providers were involved as participants and as principal investigators in the project.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N