Faultless disagreement without contradiction: expressive-relativism and predicates of personal taste.

In this paper we motivate and develop a new approach to predicates of personal taste within the framework of semantic relativism. Our primary goal is to explain faultless disagreement—the phenomenon where two parties disagree, yet both have uttered something true—which is often thought to arise from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Linguistics & Philosophy Vol. 46; no. 1; pp. 31 - 65
Main Authors: Berškytė, Justina, Stevens, Graham
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Feb2023
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=161515695&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 161515695
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01650157
        OJI
      jtl: Linguistics & Philosophy
      issn: 01650157
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2023
      vid: 46
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        161515695
        10.1007/s10988-022-09353-2
      ppf: 31
      ppct: 34
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 459KB
      tig:
        atl: Faultless disagreement without contradiction: expressive-relativism and predicates of personal taste.
      aug:
        au:
          Berškytė, Justina
          Stevens, Graham
        affil: Department of Philosophy, The University of Manchester, Humanities Bridgeford Street, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK
      su:
        Semantics
        Relativity
        Expressivism (Ethics)
        Contradiction
        Subjectivity
      sug:
        subj:
          Semantics
          Relativity
          Expressivism (Ethics)
          Contradiction
          Subjectivity
      keyword:
        Contextualism
        Expressivism
        Faultless disagreement
        Predicates of personal taste
        Semantic relativism
      ab: In this paper we motivate and develop a new approach to predicates of personal taste within the framework of semantic relativism. Our primary goal is to explain faultless disagreement—the phenomenon where two parties disagree, yet both have uttered something true—which is often thought to arise from the use of predicates of personal taste. We combine semantic relativism with an expressivist semantics to yield a novel hybrid theory which we call Expressive-Relativism. We motivate the theory by rehearsing a famous objection to Relativism from Frege which we interpret as severing the connection between contradiction and disagreement for relativists. Endorsing the objection, we respond by enriching relativism with an expressivist component which explains disagreement over matters of taste as a refusal to share perspectives rather than as resting on contradiction.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Linguistics & Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Linguistics & Philosophy
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N