Remote collection of physical performance measures for older people: a systematic review.

Remotely collected physical performance measures could improve inclusion of under-served groups in clinical research as well as enabling continuation of research in pandemic conditions. It is unclear whether remote collection is feasible and acceptable to older patients, or whether results are compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Age & Ageing Vol. 52; no. 1; pp. 1 - 12
Autores principales: Heslop, Philip A, Hurst, Christopher, Sayer, Avan A, Witham, Miles D
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jan2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=161698649&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 161698649
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00020729
        AGA
      jtl: Age & Ageing
      issn: 00020729
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2023
      vid: 52
      iid: 1
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        161698649
        10.1093/ageing/afac327
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Remote collection of physical performance measures for older people: a systematic review.
      aug:
        au:
          Heslop, Philip A
          Hurst, Christopher
          Sayer, Avan A
          Witham, Miles D
        affil: AGE Research Group, NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust , Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL , UK
      su:
        Old age
        Exercise tests
        Meta-synthesis
        Grip strength
        CINAHL database
        Medical databases
        Walking speed
        Medical information storage & retrieval systems
        Systematic reviews
        Body movement
        Quality assurance
        Descriptive statistics
        MEDLINE
      sug:
        subj:
          Old age
          Exercise tests
          Meta-synthesis
          Grip strength
          CINAHL database
          Medical databases
          Walking speed
          Medical information storage & retrieval systems
          Systematic reviews
          Body movement
          Quality assurance
          Descriptive statistics
          MEDLINE
      keyword:
        older people
        physical performance
        remote outcomes
        systematic review
        older people
        physical performance
        remote outcomes
        systematic review
      ab: Remotely collected physical performance measures could improve inclusion of under-served groups in clinical research as well as enabling continuation of research in pandemic conditions. It is unclear whether remote collection is feasible and acceptable to older patients, or whether results are comparable to face-to-face measures. We conducted a systematic review according to a prespecified protocol. We included studies with mean participant age ≥ 60 years, with no language restriction. Studies examining the gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery, distance walk tests, grip strength, Tinetti score, Berg balance test, sit-to-stand test and timed up and go were included. Reports of feasibility, acceptability, correlation between remote and face-to-face assessments and absolute differences between remote and face-to-face assessments were sought. Data were synthesised using Synthesis Without Meta-analysis methodology; 30 analyses from 17 publications were included. Study size ranged from 10 to 300 participants, with a mean age ranging from 61 to >80 years. Studies included a broad range of participants and conditions. Most studies had a moderate or high risk of bias. Only two studies undertook assessment of acceptability or feasibility, reporting good results. Correlation between face-to-face and remote measures was variable across studies, with no measure showing consistently good correlation. Only nine studies examined the accuracy of remote measures; in six studies, accuracy was rated as good (<5% mean difference between face-to-face and remote measures). There is a lack of robust evidence that remote collection of physical performance measures is acceptable to patients, feasible or provides comparable results to face-to-face measures.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N