Explaining Neural Transitions through Resource Constraints.
One challenge in explaining neural evolution is the formal equivalence of different computational architectures. If a simple architecture suffices, why should more complex neural architectures evolve? The answer must involve the intense competition for resources under which brains operate. I show ho...
| Published in: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 89; no. 5; pp. 1196 - 1203 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
Dec2022
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=161723302&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 161723302 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2022 vid: 89 iid: 5 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 161723302 10.1017/psa.2022.35 ppf: 1196 ppct: 7 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 137KB tig: atl: Explaining Neural Transitions through Resource Constraints. aug: au: Klein, Colin affil: School of Philosophy, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia su: Recurrent neural networks sug: subj: Recurrent neural networks ab: One challenge in explaining neural evolution is the formal equivalence of different computational architectures. If a simple architecture suffices, why should more complex neural architectures evolve? The answer must involve the intense competition for resources under which brains operate. I show how recurrent neural networks can be favored when increased complexity allows for more efficient use of existing resources. Although resource constraints alone can drive a change, recurrence shifts the landscape of what is later evolvable. Hence organisms on either side of a transition boundary may have similar cognitive capacities but very different potential for evolving new capacities. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|