Replication Is for Meta-Analysis.
The role or function of experimental and observational replication within empirical science has implications for how replication should be measured. Broadly, there seems to be consensus that replication's central goal is to confirm or vouchsafe the reliability of scientific findings. I argue that if...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 89; no. 5; pp. 960 - 970 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Dec2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=161723305&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 161723305 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2022 vid: 89 iid: 5 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 161723305 10.1017/psa.2022.38 ppf: 960 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 137KB tig: atl: Replication Is for Meta-Analysis. aug: au: Fletcher, Samuel C. affil: Department of Philosophy and Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA su: Scientific literature sug: subj: Scientific literature ab: The role or function of experimental and observational replication within empirical science has implications for how replication should be measured. Broadly, there seems to be consensus that replication's central goal is to confirm or vouchsafe the reliability of scientific findings. I argue that if this consensus is correct, then most of the measures of replication used in the scientific literature are actually poor indicators of this reliability or confirmation. Only meta-analytic measures of replication align functionally with the goals of replication. I conclude by addressing some objections to meta-analysis. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|