Imagen de Portada
Código QR

Mathematical Responses to the Hole Argument: Then and Now.

We argue that several apparently distinct responses to the hole argument, all invoking formal or mathematical considerations, should be viewed as a unified "mathematical response." We then consider and rebut two prominent critiques of the mathematical response before reflecting on what is ultimately...

Descripción completa

Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 89; no. 5; pp. 1223 - 1233
Autores principales: Bradley, Clara, Weatherall, James Owen
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Dec2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=161723325&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 161723325
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2022
      vid: 89
      iid: 5
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        161723325
        10.1017/psa.2022.58
      ppf: 1223
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 139KB
      tig:
        atl: Mathematical Responses to the Hole Argument: Then and Now.
      aug:
        au:
          Bradley, Clara
          Weatherall, James Owen
        affil: Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of California, Irvine, California, US
      su: Argument
      sug:
        subj: Argument
      ab: We argue that several apparently distinct responses to the hole argument, all invoking formal or mathematical considerations, should be viewed as a unified "mathematical response." We then consider and rebut two prominent critiques of the mathematical response before reflecting on what is ultimately at issue in this literature.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N