Effectiveness of a low-cost UVGI chamber for decontaminating filtering facepiece respirators to extend reuse.

In emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic, the reuse or reprocessing of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) may be required to mitigate exposure risk. Research gap: Only a few studies evaluated decontamination effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 that are practical for low-resource settings. This stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 40 - 54
Autores principales: Singh, Tanusha, Duba, Thabang, Muleba, Lufuno, Matuka, Dikeledi Onnicah, Glaser, Daniel, Ratshikhopha, Edith, Kirsten, Zubaydah, van Reenen, Tobias, Masuku, Zibusiso, Singo, Dikeledi, Ntlailane, Lebogang, Nthoke, Tebogo, Jones, David, Ross, Mary, du Toit, Pieter
Formato: CEU pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jan2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=161896548&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 161896548
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15459624
        V1L
      jtl: Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene
      issn: 15459624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2023
      vid: 20
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        161896548
        159718293
        161896548
        161896548
        10.1080/15459624.2022.2137299
        161896548
      ppf: 40
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Effectiveness of a low-cost UVGI chamber for decontaminating filtering facepiece respirators to extend reuse.
      aug:
        au:
          Singh, Tanusha
          Duba, Thabang
          Muleba, Lufuno
          Matuka, Dikeledi Onnicah
          Glaser, Daniel
          Ratshikhopha, Edith
          Kirsten, Zubaydah
          van Reenen, Tobias
          Masuku, Zibusiso
          Singo, Dikeledi
          Ntlailane, Lebogang
          Nthoke, Tebogo
          Jones, David
          Ross, Mary
          du Toit, Pieter
        affil: Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, National Institute for Occupational Health (NIOH), Johannesburg, South Africa
      sug:
        subj:
          COVID-19 Prevention and Control
          Respiratory Protective Devices Adverse Effects
          Sterilization and Disinfection Methods
          Sterilization and Disinfection Equipment and Supplies
          Sterilization and Disinfection Economics
          Ultraviolet Rays Economics
          Equipment Contamination Prevention and Control
          Infection Control Methods
          Virus Inactivation Evaluation
          Equipment Reuse
          Human
          Funding Source
          N95 Respirators
          Descriptive Statistics
          Equipment Design
          Experimental Studies
          Occupational Safety
          Education, Continuing (Credit)
      ab: In emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic, the reuse or reprocessing of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) may be required to mitigate exposure risk. Research gap: Only a few studies evaluated decontamination effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 that are practical for low-resource settings. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a relatively inexpensive ultraviolet germicidal irradiation chamber to decontaminate FFRs contaminated with SARS-CoV-2. A custom-designed UVGI chamber was constructed to determine the ability to decontaminate seven FFR models including N95s, KN95, and FFP2s inoculated with SARS-CoV-2. Vflex was excluded due to design folds/pleats and UVGI shadowing inside the chamber. Structural and functional integrity tolerated by each FFR model on repeated decontamination cycles was assessed. Twenty-seven participants were fit-tested over 30 cycles for each model and passed if the fit factor was ≥100. Of the FFR models included for testing, only the KN95 model failed filtration. The 3M™ 3M 1860 and Halyard™ duckbill 46727 (formerly Kimberly Clark) models performed better on fit testing than other models for both pre-and-post decontaminations. Fewer participants (0.3 and 0.7%, respectively) passed fit testing for Makrite 9500 N95 and Greenline 5200 FFP2 and only two for the KN95 model post decontamination. Fit testing appeared to be more affected by donning & doffing, as some passed with adjustment and repeat fit testing. A ≥ 3 log reduction of SARS-CoV-2 was achieved for worn-in FFRs namely Greenline 5200 FFP2. Conclusion: The study showed that not all FFRs tested could withstand 30 cycles of UVGI decontamination without diminishing filtration efficiency or facial fit. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 log reduction varied across the FFRs, implying that the decontamination efficacy largely depends on the decontamination protocol and selection of FFRs. We demonstrated the effectiveness of a low-cost and scalable decontamination method for SARS-CoV-2 and the effect on fit testing using people instead of manikins. It is recognized that extensive experimental evidence for the reuse of decontaminated FFRs is lacking, and thus this study would be relevant and of interest in crisis-capacity settings, particularly in low-resource facilities.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        CEU
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N