Expert-Level Immunofixation Electrophoresis Image Recognition based on Explainable and Generalizable Deep Learning.

BACKGROUND: Immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) is important for diagnosis of plasma cell disorders (PCDs). Manual analysis of IFE images is time-consuming and potentially subjective. An artificial intelligence (AI) system for automatic and accurate IFE image recognition is desirable. METHODS: In t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical Chemistry Vol. 69; no. 2; pp. 130 - 140
Main Authors: Honghua Hu, Wei Xu, Ting Jiang, Yuheng Cheng, Xiaoyan Tao, Wenna Liu, Meiling Jian, Kang Li, Guotai Wang
Format: Journal Article
Published: Oxford University Press / USA Feb2023
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND: Immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) is important for diagnosis of plasma cell disorders (PCDs). Manual analysis of IFE images is time-consuming and potentially subjective. An artificial intelligence (AI) system for automatic and accurate IFE image recognition is desirable. METHODS: In total, 12 703 expert-annotated IFE images (9182 from a new IFE imaging system and 3521 from an old one) were used to develop and test an AI system that was an ensemble of 3 deep neural networks. The model takes an IFE image as input and predicts the presence of 8 basic patterns (IgA-κ, IgA-λ, IgG-κ, IgG-λ, IgM-κ, IgM-λ, and their combinations. Score-based class activation maps (Score-CAMs) were used for visual explanation of the model's prediction. RESULTS: The AI model achieved an average accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 99.82%, 93.17%, and 99.93%, respectively, for detection of the 8 basic patterns, which outperformed 4 junior experts with <1 year's experience and was comparable to a senior expert with 5 years' experience. The Score-CAMs gave a reasonable visual explanation of the prediction by highlighting the target aligned regions in the bands and indicating potentially unreliable predictions. When trained with only the new system images, the model's performance was still higher than junior experts on both the new and old IFE systems, with average accuracy of 99.91% and 99.81%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our AI system achieved human-level performance in automatic recognition of IFE images, with high explainability and generalizability. It has the potential to improve the efficiency and reliability of diagnosis of PCDs.