Sources and destinations of misattributions in recall of instances of repeated events.
Repeated experience of events promotes schema formation. Later activation of the schema facilitates recall of the general structure of the events, whereas attribution of details to instances requires systematic decision-making based on detail characteristics. For repeated events, source monitoring m...
| Publicado en: | Memory & Cognition Vol. 51; no. 1; pp. 188 - 203 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jan2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=162013524&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 162013524 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0090502X MEG jtl: Memory & Cognition issn: 0090502X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2023 vid: 51 iid: 1 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 162013524 10.3758/s13421-022-01300-7 ppf: 188 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.2MB tig: atl: Sources and destinations of misattributions in recall of instances of repeated events. aug: au: Rubínová, Eva Kontogianni, Feni affil: Department of Psychology, Thompson Rivers University, 805 TRU Way, V2C 0C8, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada Department of Psychology, Winchester University, SO22 4NR, Winchester, UK su: Memory Research funding sug: subj: Memory Research funding keyword: Misattribution Repeated events Source monitoring Misattribution Repeated events Source monitoring ab: Repeated experience of events promotes schema formation. Later activation of the schema facilitates recall of the general structure of the events, whereas attribution of details to instances requires systematic decision-making based on detail characteristics. For repeated events, source monitoring may be less effective due to the similarity and interference of details across instances and consequently result in source attribution errors. To date, researchers have examined aggregated misattributions across instances and have found that misattributions are more frequent in the middle than in the boundary instances. In this study, we investigated the trajectories of misattributions using data from six studies (N = 633), where participants recalled repeated interactive marketing-themed events (Study 1), mock-crime filmed events (Study 2), stories (Study 3), and categorized word lists (Studies 4–6). The patterns confirmed the expected primacy and recency effects, showing fewer misattributions from and to the boundary instances relative to the middle instances. In addition, the patterns indicated proximity effects: Confusions more frequently occurred across adjacent instances and gradually decreased for instances that were further apart from the source. Our findings suggest that detail characteristics that form the basis of source attribution decisions provide information about the relative position of instances in repeated events, where the boundary instances serve as anchors, and where confusion relatively easily occurs across neighbouring instances. In line with context-based models of memory, our findings indicate that a higher-level organization of repeated events that emerges at encoding guides retrieval and source monitoring decisions. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|