Ankle Inversion Proprioception Impairment in Persons with Chronic Ankle Instability Is Task-Specific.

While investigators have often compared ankle proprioception between groups with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI), findings have been inconsistent. Possibly this is because ankle proprioceptive impairment in this population is task-specific. Thus, we aimed to compare ankle inversion propr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Perceptual & Motor Skills Vol. 129; no. 6; pp. 1736 - 1749
Autores principales: Han, Jia, Yang, Zonghan, Witchalls, Jeremy, Ganderton, Charlotte, Adams, Roger, Waddington, Gordon
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Dec2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=162029860&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 162029860
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00315125
        PSK
      jtl: Perceptual & Motor Skills
      issn: 00315125
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2022
      vid: 129
      iid: 6
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        162029860
        10.1177/00315125221125608
      ppf: 1736
      ppct: 13
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Ankle Inversion Proprioception Impairment in Persons with Chronic Ankle Instability Is Task-Specific.
      aug:
        au:
          Han, Jia
          Yang, Zonghan
          Witchalls, Jeremy
          Ganderton, Charlotte
          Adams, Roger
          Waddington, Gordon
        affil:
          College of Rehabilitation Sciences, 191610 Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China
          Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, 2234 University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia
          Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, 444935 Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia
          Department of Physiotherapy, 85084 University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
      su:
        Analysis of variance
        Task performance
        Statistics
        Proprioception
        Joint instability
        Standing position
        Ankle injuries
        One-leg resting position
        Comparative studies
        Body movement
        Foot
        Research funding
        Descriptive statistics
        Jumping
        Receiver operating characteristic curves
        Data analysis
      sug:
        subj:
          Analysis of variance
          Task performance
          Statistics
          Proprioception
          Joint instability
          Standing position
          Ankle injuries
          One-leg resting position
          Comparative studies
          Body movement
          Foot
          Research funding
          Descriptive statistics
          Jumping
          Receiver operating characteristic curves
          Data analysis
      keyword:
        ankle injury
        balance
        proprioceptive testing
        rehabilitation
        ankle injury
        balance
        proprioceptive testing
        rehabilitation
      ab: While investigators have often compared ankle proprioception between groups with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI), findings have been inconsistent. Possibly this is because ankle proprioceptive impairment in this population is task-specific. Thus, we aimed to compare ankle inversion proprioception in individuals with and without CAI in two task conditions: (i) when standing (not challenging) and (ii) when on a step-down landing (minimally-challenging). Ankle inversion proprioception was measured in both conditions for 38 recreational sport player volunteers with CAI (n = 19) and without CAI (n = 19). We used the Active Movement Extent Discrimination Apparatus (AMEDA) for the standing condition and the Ankle Inversion Discrimination Apparatus-Landing (AIDAL) for step-down landing. From analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests, CAI and non-CAI participants performed equally well on the AMEDA when standing; but the CAI group performed significantly worse than the non-CAI group on the AIDAL step-down landing task (p = 0.03). Within the non-CAI group, the AIDAL proprioceptive scores, as area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), were significantly higher than their AMEDA AUC scores (p = 0.03), while there was no significant difference between AIDAL and AMEDA AUC scores in the CAI group. Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool CAIT scores were significantly correlated with AIDAL scores (Spearman's rho = 0.391, p = 0.015), but not with the AMEDA scores; and there was no significant correlation between the AIDAL and AMEDA scores. Thus, an ankle inversion proprioceptive deficit was evident for persons with CAI on the step-down AIDAL, and in a dose-response way, but not evident on the standing AMEDA, suggesting that ankle proprioceptive impairment is task-specific. Selected proprioceptive tests must present some minimal degree of challenge to the ankle joint in a functional task in order to differentiate CAI from non-CAI participants.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N