No Place for Private Practice.

Wittgenstein harshly criticized what he considered "mythologies" infecting our understanding of how mathematics work. He was especially reluctant to the idea that they describe a realm of abstract entities influencing our cognitive capacities. Several Wittgenstein scholars have drawn the conclusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 297 - 306
Autor principal: Le Du, Michel
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Feb2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=162113280&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 162113280
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01677411
        NM2
      jtl: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy
      issn: 01677411
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2023
      vid: 42
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        162113280
        10.1007/s11245-022-09863-5
      ppf: 297
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 777KB
      tig:
        atl: No Place for Private Practice.
      aug:
        au: Le Du, Michel
        affil: Department of Philosophy, Centre Gilles-Gaston Granger, Aix-Marseille University, UMR 7304, AMU-CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France
      su:
        Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951
        Sociological research
        Mathematics
      sug:
        subj:
          Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951
          Sociological research
          Mathematics
      keyword:
        Conventionalism
        David Bloor
        Institutions
        Ludwig Wittgenstein
        Realism
        Rules
        Societal facts
      ab: Wittgenstein harshly criticized what he considered "mythologies" infecting our understanding of how mathematics work. He was especially reluctant to the idea that they describe a realm of abstract entities influencing our cognitive capacities. Several Wittgenstein scholars have drawn the conclusion that his analysis results in a sociological interpretation of mathematics. The present paper aims at demonstrating that although mathematical practices deserve to be called "social" this doesn't necessarily leads us to the conclusion that they are offered to sociological explanation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N