Computer International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) algorithms: a review.
Study design: Literature review and survey. Objectives: To provide an overview of existing computerized International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) algorithms and to evaluate the use of the current algorithms in research and clinical care. Setting: Not app...
| Publicado en: | Spinal Cord Vol. 61; no. 2; pp. 125 - 133 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | pictorial review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Feb2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=162114076&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 162114076 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 13624393 DZQ jtl: Spinal Cord issn: 13624393 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Feb2023 vid: 61 iid: 2 pid: 2579 pub: Springer Nature place: Dordrecht, <Blank> artinfo: ui: 162114076 162114076 162114076 10.1038/s41393-022-00854-2 162114076 ppf: 125 ppct: 8 formats: tig: atl: Computer International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) algorithms: a review. aug: au: Walden, Kristen Schuld, Christian Noonan, Vanessa K. Rupp, Rüdiger affil: Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada sug: subj: Spinal Cord Injuries Classification Algorithms Data Quality ab: Study design: Literature review and survey. Objectives: To provide an overview of existing computerized International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) algorithms and to evaluate the use of the current algorithms in research and clinical care. Setting: Not applicable. Methods: Literature review according to three organizing concepts for evaluation of Health Information Products (reach, usefulness, and use) was conducted. Results: While the use of computerized ISNCSCI algorithms has been around for many years, many were developed and used internally for specific projects or not maintained. Today the International SCI community has free access to algorithms from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) and the Praxis Spinal Cord Institute. Both algorithms have been validated in large datasets and are used in different SCI registries for quality control and education purposes. The use of the Praxis Institute algorithm by clinicians was highlighted through the Praxis User Survey (n = 76) which included participants from 27 countries. The survey found that over half of the participants using the algorithm (N = 69) did so on a regular basis (51%), with 54% having incorporated it into their regular workflow. Conclusions: Validated computerized ISNCSCI classification tools have evolved substantially and support education, clinical documentation, communication between clinicians and their patients, and ISNCSCI data quality around the world. They are not intended to replace well-trained clinicians, but allow for reclassification of ISNCSCI datasets with updated versions of the ISCNSCI, and support rapid classification of large datasets. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|