(Mis)Trust and Pragmatism as Grounded Normativity.
In 2009, the us federal government settled a class action lawsuit, I Cobell v. Salazar i , where the plaintiffs, a group of 250,000 Native Americans, declared that the government had "breached and [is] in continuing breach of their trust obligations to class members" ([9]). Leonard Harris's critique...
| Publicado en: | Pluralist Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 41 - 49 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Illinois Press
Spring2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=162167309&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 162167309 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 19307365 3BAR jtl: Pluralist issn: 19307365 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring2023 vid: 18 iid: 1 pid: 416 pub: University of Illinois Press artinfo: ui: 162167309 10.5406/19446489.18.1.05 ppf: 41 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 81KB tig: atl: (Mis)Trust and Pragmatism as Grounded Normativity. aug: au: Pratt, Scott L. affil: University of Oregon su: Trust Scientists' attitudes sug: subj: Trust Scientists' attitudes ab: In 2009, the us federal government settled a class action lawsuit, I Cobell v. Salazar i , where the plaintiffs, a group of 250,000 Native Americans, declared that the government had "breached and [is] in continuing breach of their trust obligations to class members" ([9]). Leonard Harris's critique of classical pragmatism argues that its emphasis on process over the issues at hand makes it inadequate in support of efforts to radically transform an oppressive society. While this criticism may stand if only classical pragmatism is considered, the general principles of pragmatic inquiry point toward a more radical conception of pragmatism from which to criticize trust and mistrust as a framework for decolonial action. In the case of I Cobell v. Salazar i , one could argue that successfully calling into question the trust relationship between Indigenous nations and the government of the United States is a good example of the role of I mistrust i , a failure of that confidence. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Pluralist is the property of University of Illinois Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Pluralist holder: University of Illinois Press dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|