Predicting Fitness to Drive for Medically At-Risk Drivers Using Touchscreen DriveSafe DriveAware.

Importance: Occupational therapists require valid cognitive fitness-to-drive tools to advise drivers in this high-stakes area. Objective: To examine the psychometric properties and predictive validity of data gathered with the touchscreen DriveSafe DriveAware (DSDA). Design: Prospective study that c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Journal of Occupational Therapy Vol. 77; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
Main Authors: Cheal, Beth, Bundy, Anita, Patomella, Ann-Helen, Kuang, Haijiang, Scanlan, Justin Newton
Format: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: American Occupational Therapy Association Jan/Feb2023
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=162168891&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 162168891
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02729490
        44I
      jtl: American Journal of Occupational Therapy
      issn: 02729490
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan/Feb2023
      vid: 77
      iid: 1
      pid: 6680
      pub: American Occupational Therapy Association
      place: North Bethesda, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        162168891
        162168891
        162168891
        10.5014/ajot.2023.050048
        162168891
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Predicting Fitness to Drive for Medically At-Risk Drivers Using Touchscreen DriveSafe DriveAware.
      aug:
        au:
          Cheal, Beth
          Bundy, Anita
          Patomella, Ann-Helen
          Kuang, Haijiang
          Scanlan, Justin Newton
        affil: Beth Cheal, PhD, is Lecturer, Occupational Therapy Program, School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. At the time of the research, Cheal was PhD Student, Occupational Therapy, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Automobile Driving Evaluation
          Psychometrics
          Instrument Validation
          Occupational Therapy
          Human
          Prospective Studies
          Australia
          New Zealand
          Aged
          Male
          Female
          Cognition Disorders
          Rasch Analysis
          Goodness of Fit Chi Square Test
          Construct Validity
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Importance: Occupational therapists require valid cognitive fitness-to-drive tools to advise drivers in this high-stakes area. Objective: To examine the psychometric properties and predictive validity of data gathered with the touchscreen DriveSafe DriveAware (DSDA). Design: Prospective study that compared a screening tool with a criterion standard. Setting: Ten community- and hospital-based driver assessment clinics in Australia and New Zealand. Participants: Older and cognitively impaired drivers (N = 134) ages 18 to 91 years (Mage= 68) who were referred for an assessment to determine the impact of a medical condition on driving. The inclusion criteria were a valid driver's license, vision within license authority guidelines, completion of at least 1 year of high school, and English as a first language. Outcomes and Measures: The results of the touchscreen DSDA, a standardized assessment of awareness of the driving environment and one's own driving abilities, were compared with those of a standardized occupational therapist–administered on-road assessment. Results: Rasch analysis provided evidence for the construct validity and internal reliability of data gathered with the touchscreen DSDA. Optimal upper and lower cutoff scores were set to trichotomize drivers into three categories: likely to pass an on-road assessment, likely to fail an on-road assessment, and further testing required. Specificity of the touchscreen DSDA was 86%, and sensitivity was 91%; positive predictive value was 83%, negative predictive value was 92%, and overall accuracy of classification was 88%. Conclusions and Relevance: Evidence supports the utility of the touchscreen DSDA for accurately predicting which participants require on-road assessment. What This Article Adds: The touchscreen DSDA is a promising screen for occupational therapists and other health professionals to use in conjunction with other clinical indicators to determine whether drivers require further assessment. Evidence supports the utility of the touchscreen DriveSafe DriveAware (DSDA) for occupational therapists to use in conjunction with other clinical indicators to determine accurately whether drivers require further assessment.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N