Collaboratively maximizing the impact of human-centered design in psychological and implementation science: Reply to Proctor et al. (2021).

Proctor et al.’s (2021) comment “Division 21 Has Been Devoted to Human-Centered Design Since the 1950s” on our article (Lyon et al., 2020) is a welcome addition and useful touchpoint surrounding the historical and current relationship between human-centered design and psychological science. “Siloing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Psychologist Vol. 76; no. 7; pp. 1189 - 1191
Autores principales: Lyon, Aaron R., Brewer, Stephanie K., Areán, Patricia A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association Oct2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=162184020&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 162184020
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0003066X
        APT
      jtl: American Psychologist
      issn: 0003066X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2021
      vid: 76
      iid: 7
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        162184020
        10.1037/amp0000856
      ppf: 1189
      ppct: 2
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Collaboratively maximizing the impact of human-centered design in psychological and implementation science: Reply to Proctor et al. (2021).
      aug:
        au:
          Lyon, Aaron R.
          Brewer, Stephanie K.
          Areán, Patricia A.
      su:
        Psychiatry
        Medical care
        Interprofessional relations
        Medical research
        Universal design
        Medical protocols
      sug:
        subj:
          Psychiatry
          Medical care
          Interprofessional relations
          Medical research
          Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
          Universal design
          Medical protocols
      ab: Proctor et al.’s (2021) comment “Division 21 Has Been Devoted to Human-Centered Design Since the 1950s” on our article (Lyon et al., 2020) is a welcome addition and useful touchpoint surrounding the historical and current relationship between human-centered design and psychological science. “Siloing” in psychology inhibits the progress of the discipline. We offer a set of recommendations for reducing silos and increasing the integration of engineering psychology with implementation science to advance human-centered design and the use of research evidence in practice.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N