간호사정에 필요한 의사소통능력 측정도구의 신뢰도와 타당도 검증.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the short-version for clinical nurses on a communication competence scale developed to measure the communication competence of clinical nurses. Methods: Data were collected from 396 clinical nurses who work at general hos...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 78 - 90 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing
Feb2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=162192916&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 162192916 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: DAEG jtl: Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2023 vid: 30 iid: 1 pid: 72189 pub: Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing place: , <Blank> artinfo: ui: 162192916 162192916 162192916 10.7739/jkafn.2023.30.1.78 162192916 ppf: 78 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: 간호사정에 필요한 의사소통능력 측정도구의 신뢰도와 타당도 검증. aug: au: 김효진 오희영 affil: 대전을지대학교병원 간호사 sug: subj: Nurses Psychosocial Factors Communication Evaluation Instrument Validation Reliability and Validity Nursing Assessment Evaluation Human Male Female Adult Middle Age Discriminant Validity Criterion-Related Validity Internal Consistency Test-Retest Reliability Exploratory Research Factor Analysis Pearson's Correlation Coefficient Coefficient alpha Scales Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male Female ab: Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the short-version for clinical nurses on a communication competence scale developed to measure the communication competence of clinical nurses. Methods: Data were collected from 396 clinical nurses who work at general hospitals in Korea. The original version of the Communication Ability Scale was shorted and content, construct, item-convergent/discriminant, convergent validity and also internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated. Data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Pearsons's correlation coefficient and Cronbach's α. Results: As a result of item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, 5 subscales and a total of 20 items were derived. The confirmatory factor analysis showed adequate model fit indices (Normed, χ²=1.88, RMR=.04, RMSEA=.07, GFI=.87, CFI=.90, TLI=.87, IFI=.89). The items convergence and discrimination validity were verified using the Average Variance Extracted (.50~.56), composite reliability (.76~.86) and 0 ±2SE (.42~.99). Convergent validity was demonstrated using Korean Version of Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (r=.59, p<.001). Internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability were found to be acceptable, as indicated by a Cronbach's α of .65~.79 and an intra-class correlation coefficient of .82~.90. The validity and reliability of the scale were verified. Conclusion: The NACCS is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring communication competence for clinical nurses in Korea. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: Korean refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|