Exploring the Impact of Tensions in Stakeholder Norms on Designing for Value Change: The Case of Biosafety in Industrial Biotechnology.

Synthetic biologists design and engineer organisms for a better and more sustainable future. While the manifold prospects are encouraging, concerns about the uncertain risks of genome editing affect public opinion as well as local regulations. As a consequence, biosafety and associated concepts, suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 1 - 29
Autores principales: Asin-Garcia, Enrique, Robaey, Zoë, Kampers, Linde F. C., Martins dos Santos, Vitor A. P.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=162283548&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 162283548
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13533452
        GNI
      jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics
      issn: 13533452
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2023
      vid: 29
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        162283548
        10.1007/s11948-023-00432-6
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 28
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 2.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Exploring the Impact of Tensions in Stakeholder Norms on Designing for Value Change: The Case of Biosafety in Industrial Biotechnology.
      aug:
        au:
          Asin-Garcia, Enrique
          Robaey, Zoë
          Kampers, Linde F. C.
          Martins dos Santos, Vitor A. P.
        affil:
          Laboratory of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Wageningen University & Research, 6708, Wageningen, WE, The Netherlands
          Bioprocess Engineering Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700, Wageningen, AA, The Netherlands
          Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6708, Wageningen, WE, The Netherlands
          LifeGlimmer GmbH, Berlin, Germany
      sug:
      keyword:
        Biosafety
        Genetic safeguards
        Industrial biotechnology
        Multistakeholder approach
        Safe-by-design framework
        Value sensitive design
      ab: Synthetic biologists design and engineer organisms for a better and more sustainable future. While the manifold prospects are encouraging, concerns about the uncertain risks of genome editing affect public opinion as well as local regulations. As a consequence, biosafety and associated concepts, such as the Safe-by-design framework and genetic safeguard technologies, have gained notoriety and occupy a central position in the conversation about genetically modified organisms. Yet, as regulatory interest and academic research in genetic safeguard technologies advance, the implementation in industrial biotechnology, a sector that is already employing engineered microorganisms, lags behind. The main goal of this work is to explore the utilization of genetic safeguard technologies for designing biosafety in industrial biotechnology. Based on our results, we posit that biosafety is a case of a changing value, by means of further specification of how to realize biosafety. Our investigation is inspired by the Value Sensitive Design framework, to investigate scientific and technological choices in their appropriate social context. Our findings discuss stakeholder norms for biosafety, reasonings about genetic safeguards, and how these impact the practice of designing for biosafety. We show that tensions between stakeholders occur at the level of norms, and that prior stakeholder alignment is crucial for value specification to happen in practice. Finally, we elaborate in different reasonings about genetic safeguards for biosafety and conclude that, in absence of a common multi-stakeholder effort, the differences in informal biosafety norms and the disparity in biosafety thinking could end up leading to design requirements for compliance instead of for safety.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Science & Engineering Ethics
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N