Complementarity of additionalities resulting from European Union funds: Perspective of the users of research infrastructures.

The goal of this paper is to investigate the complementarity of three types of additionalities: input (growth of R&D investments), behavioral (changes in the internal processes of the entity), and output (leveraging social or private returns), occurring as the result of the 7th Framework Programme a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Review of Policy Research Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 307 - 332
Autores principales: Hegerty, Scott W., Kowalski, Arkadiusz M., Lewandowska, Małgorzata S.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=162382017&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 162382017
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1541132X
        MJJ
      jtl: Review of Policy Research
      issn: 1541132X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2023
      vid: 40
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        162382017
        10.1111/ropr.12480
      ppf: 307
      ppct: 25
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 529KB
      tig:
        atl: Complementarity of additionalities resulting from European Union funds: Perspective of the users of research infrastructures.
      aug:
        au:
          Hegerty, Scott W.
          Kowalski, Arkadiusz M.
          Lewandowska, Małgorzata S.
        affil:
          Department of Economics, Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago Illinois,, USA
          World Economy Research Institute, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
          Department of International Management, SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
      su:
        European Union
        Conceptual models
        Logistic regression analysis
        Brexit Referendum, 2016
      sug:
        subj:
          European Union
          Conceptual models
          Logistic regression analysis
          Brexit Referendum, 2016
      keyword:
        additionality
        complementarity
        public financial support
        research infrastructure
        adicionalidad
        apoyo financiero público
        complementariedad
        infraestructura de investigación
        互補性
        公共財政支持
        關鍵詞:研究基礎設施
        額外性
        additionality
        complementarity
        public financial support
        research infrastructure
        adicionalidad
        apoyo financiero público
        complementariedad
        infraestructura de investigación
        互補性
        公共財政支持
        關鍵詞:研究基礎設施
        額外性
      ab: The goal of this paper is to investigate the complementarity of three types of additionalities: input (growth of R&D investments), behavioral (changes in the internal processes of the entity), and output (leveraging social or private returns), occurring as the result of the 7th Framework Programme and Horizon 2020 European Union funds part INFRA. The empirical contribution is based on results of self‐created questionnaires conducted in 2016 with the use of CATI/CAWI on the unique sample of N = 401 users of European Union research infrastructures from 32 countries. We create a Behavioral Additionality Index (BAI), which is a measurement tool that combines eight types (scale, scope, cognitive capacity, challenge, network, follow‐up, management, and acceleration) of behavioral additionalities. Based on the results of a logistic regression, we find that there is a positive relationship between input and behavioral additionality, as well as between behavioral additionality and output additionality. This last link, however, is not shown to be strengthened by input additionality. No significant differences in the level of the BAI were found between EU countries based on their level of innovativeness as measured by the Summary Innovation Index (SII), although we can observe that less developed EU countries, as well as on non‐EU countries, have higher BAI scores compared to developed ones. The overall results lead to the conclusion that the evaluation of public financial support has to be conducted not only for input, behavioral, and output additionalities separately, but must also take into account their complementarity—with its major focus on the behavioral aspects of this effect.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N