'Medical Corona Science': Philosophical and systemic issues: Re‐thinking medicine? On the epistemology of Corona medicine.
Rationale, Aims, and Objectives: The disciplinary profile and the quality of production of knowledge on Corona pandemic is studied. This scientific field is called 'Medical Corona Science'. Methods: Criteria of analytical philosophy of science and science studies are systematically applied. Results:...
| Published in: | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 405 - 415 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Apr2023
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=162398283&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 162398283 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 13561294 EV1 jtl: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice issn: 13561294 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Apr2023 vid: 29 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 162398283 157902629 162398283 162398283 10.1111/jep.13734 162398283 ppf: 405 ppct: 10 formats: tig: atl: 'Medical Corona Science': Philosophical and systemic issues: Re‐thinking medicine? On the epistemology of Corona medicine. aug: au: Tretter, Felix Marcum, James affil: Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science, Vienna, Austria sug: subj: Knowledge Medicine COVID-19 Pandemic Epistemology Human Male Female Virology Data Science Implementation Science Education, Medical Systems Analysis Male Female ab: Rationale, Aims, and Objectives: The disciplinary profile and the quality of production of knowledge on Corona pandemic is studied. This scientific field is called 'Medical Corona Science'. Methods: Criteria of analytical philosophy of science and science studies are systematically applied. Results: It is shown that mainly auxiliary medical disciplines such as virology and epidemiology but not clinical disciplines provide Corona knowledge. We see a laboratory‐centered, technology‐ and data‐driven science, largely ignoring clinical issues. Therefore we call these approaches "Medical Corona Science" (MCS). We see the need to adapt to features of a 'post‐normal science', a 'mode 2 science' and of 'Integration and Implementation Science', especially as clinical knowledge must be integrated. There is also a severe lack of theoretical considerations that could help to frame the pandemic as a complex dynamic system. Conclusions: We suggest a deeper meta‐scientific discussion of the epistemic value of MCS and propose the application of tools from systems science. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|