'Medical Corona Science': Philosophical and systemic issues: Re‐thinking medicine? On the epistemology of Corona medicine.

Rationale, Aims, and Objectives: The disciplinary profile and the quality of production of knowledge on Corona pandemic is studied. This scientific field is called 'Medical Corona Science'. Methods: Criteria of analytical philosophy of science and science studies are systematically applied. Results:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 405 - 415
Main Authors: Tretter, Felix, Marcum, James
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2023
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=162398283&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 162398283
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13561294
        EV1
      jtl: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
      issn: 13561294
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2023
      vid: 29
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        162398283
        157902629
        162398283
        162398283
        10.1111/jep.13734
        162398283
      ppf: 405
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: 'Medical Corona Science': Philosophical and systemic issues: Re‐thinking medicine? On the epistemology of Corona medicine.
      aug:
        au:
          Tretter, Felix
          Marcum, James
        affil: Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science, Vienna, Austria
      sug:
        subj:
          Knowledge
          Medicine
          COVID-19 Pandemic
          Epistemology
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Virology
          Data Science
          Implementation Science
          Education, Medical
          Systems Analysis
          Male
          Female
      ab: Rationale, Aims, and Objectives: The disciplinary profile and the quality of production of knowledge on Corona pandemic is studied. This scientific field is called 'Medical Corona Science'. Methods: Criteria of analytical philosophy of science and science studies are systematically applied. Results: It is shown that mainly auxiliary medical disciplines such as virology and epidemiology but not clinical disciplines provide Corona knowledge. We see a laboratory‐centered, technology‐ and data‐driven science, largely ignoring clinical issues. Therefore we call these approaches "Medical Corona Science" (MCS). We see the need to adapt to features of a 'post‐normal science', a 'mode 2 science' and of 'Integration and Implementation Science', especially as clinical knowledge must be integrated. There is also a severe lack of theoretical considerations that could help to frame the pandemic as a complex dynamic system. Conclusions: We suggest a deeper meta‐scientific discussion of the epistemic value of MCS and propose the application of tools from systems science.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N