Logic in Rhetoric--And Vice Versa.
This article discusses the concepts of logic and rhetoric based on the fundamental philosophical tenets proposed by Greek philosopher Aristotle. According to Aristotle, rhetoric is antistrophic to dialectic. On the other hand, Bertrand Russell, the Vienna Circle, and other philosophers believe that...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy & Rhetoric Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 169 - 191 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Pennsylvania State University Press
Summer1993
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=16242356&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 16242356 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318213 0VY jtl: Philosophy & Rhetoric issn: 00318213 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Summer1993 vid: 26 iid: 3 pid: 745 pub: Pennsylvania State University Press artinfo: ui: 16242356 ppf: 169 ppct: 22 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.1MB tig: atl: Logic in Rhetoric--And Vice Versa. aug: au: Bybee, Michael D. affil: Department of English, University of Oregon su: Logic Rhetoric Aristotle's Rhetoric theory (Communication) Communication methodology Philosophy Russell, Bertrand, 1872-1970 sug: subj: Logic Rhetoric Aristotle's Rhetoric theory (Communication) Communication methodology Philosophy Russell, Bertrand, 1872-1970 ab: This article discusses the concepts of logic and rhetoric based on the fundamental philosophical tenets proposed by Greek philosopher Aristotle. According to Aristotle, rhetoric is antistrophic to dialectic. On the other hand, Bertrand Russell, the Vienna Circle, and other philosophers believe that only experimental verification or deductive reasoning justify conclusions and that all other rhetorical elements consist of irrational and hence invalid persuasion. In classical Greek, the word sylloge relates to a gathering, collection or assembly. Because Aristotle thought inductive inferences were matters of example, and because he was quite unaware of abductive inferences, he used the word syllogismos to refer only to deductive inferences. Although he says he means by the word syllogismos what is called deductive inferences, he nonetheless examines in practice only those deductive arguments comprising three categorical propositions sharing three terms. This concentration on solely categorical syllogisms effectively eliminates from consideration all other kinds of deductive arguments, most notably relational arguments. Unfortunately, some students of rhetoric think that formal logic consists solely of deductive logic. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy & Rhetoric is the property of Pennsylvania State University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy & Rhetoric holder: Pennsylvania State University Press dt: @attributes: year: 1993 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|