QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ABDUCTIVE INQUIRY.

The author comments on the article Two Models of Abductive Inquiry, by Brian Domino, which rightly suggests that an adequate account of abduction must consider the possibility that some predicates are qualitatively more important than others. Although I agree that abduction includes a qualitative co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy & Rhetoric Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 415 - 418
Autor principal: Bybee, Michael D.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Pennsylvania State University Press Fall1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=16242636&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 16242636
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318213
        0VY
      jtl: Philosophy & Rhetoric
      issn: 00318213
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Fall1994
      vid: 27
      iid: 4
      pid: 745
      pub: Pennsylvania State University Press
    artinfo:
      ui: 16242636
      ppf: 415
      ppct: 3
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 123KB
      tig:
        atl: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ABDUCTIVE INQUIRY.
      aug:
        au: Bybee, Michael D.
        affil: Department of English, University of Oregon
      su:
        Abduction (Logic)
        Inquiry (Theory of knowledge)
        Predicate (Logic)
        Logic
        Theory of knowledge
        Language & logic
        Domino, Brian
      sug:
        subj:
          Abduction (Logic)
          Inquiry (Theory of knowledge)
          Predicate (Logic)
          Logic
          Theory of knowledge
          Language & logic
          Domino, Brian
      ab: The author comments on the article Two Models of Abductive Inquiry, by Brian Domino, which rightly suggests that an adequate account of abduction must consider the possibility that some predicates are qualitatively more important than others. Although I agree that abduction includes a qualitative component, I hesitate to abandon the quantitative component altogether, for granted that some predicates are more relevant, surely the greater the number of relevant predicates two objects share, the more persuasive the abduction. I also hesitate to adopt the clincher model that Domino provides. The claim that real inquirers cannot legitimately stop amassing abductive predicates at any point less than a perfect abduction apparently assumes that only certainty provides the legitimate basis for ending the collection of abductive predicates. The aim of inquiry, however, is not certainty but belief, that is, a level of confidence or comfort that a given proposition is true. Those with a greater need for certainty may well have to amass more or different predicates than those with a lesser need to achieve the threshold of belief, but all inquirers stop amassing predicates whenever they reach their level of confidence, whatever that may be and however they achieve it.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy & Rhetoric is the property of Pennsylvania State University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy & Rhetoric
      holder: Pennsylvania State University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1994
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N