Neutral Free Logic: Motivation, Proof Theory and Models.

Free logics are a family of first-order logics which came about as a result of examining the existence assumptions of classical logic (Hintikka The Journal of Philosophy, 56, 125–137 1959; Lambert Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 8, 133–144 1967, 1997, 2001). What those assumptions are varies, bu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Philosophical Logic Vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 519 - 555
Autores principales: Pavlović, Edi, Gratzl, Norbert
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=162802439&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 162802439
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00223611
        JPH
      jtl: Journal of Philosophical Logic
      issn: 00223611
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2023
      vid: 52
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        162802439
        10.1007/s10992-022-09679-z
      ppf: 519
      ppct: 36
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 806KB
      tig:
        atl: Neutral Free Logic: Motivation, Proof Theory and Models.
      aug:
        au:
          Pavlović, Edi
          Gratzl, Norbert
        affil: Fakultät für Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP), Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Geschwister Scholl Platz 1, 80539, München, Germany
      su:
        Proof theory
        Model theory
        First-order logic
        Presupposition (Logic)
        Logic
        Motivation (Psychology)
      sug:
        subj:
          Proof theory
          Model theory
          First-order logic
          Presupposition (Logic)
          Logic
          Motivation (Psychology)
      keyword:
        Cut elimination
        G3 sequent calculus
        Generalized semantics
        Neutral free logic
      ab: Free logics are a family of first-order logics which came about as a result of examining the existence assumptions of classical logic (Hintikka The Journal of Philosophy, 56, 125–137 1959; Lambert Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 8, 133–144 1967, 1997, 2001). What those assumptions are varies, but the central ones are that (i) the domain of interpretation is not empty, (ii) every name denotes exactly one object in the domain and (iii) the quantifiers have existential import. Free logics reject the claim that names need to denote in (ii). Positive free logic concedes that some atomic formulas containing non-denoting names (including self-identity) are true, negative free logic treats them as uniformly false, and neutral free logic as taking a third value. There has been a renewed interest in analyzing proof theory of free logic in recent years, based on intuitionistic logic in Maffezioli and Orlandelli (Bulletin of the Section of Logic, 48(2), 137–158 2019) as well as classical logic in Pavlović and Gratzl (Journal of Philosophical Logic, 50, 117–148 2021), there for the positive and negative variants. While the latter streamlines the presentation of free logics and offers a more unified approach to the variants under consideration, it does not cover neutral free logic, since there is some lack of both clear formal intuitions on the semantic status of formulas with empty names, as well as a satisfying account of the conditional in this context. We discuss extending the results to this third major variant of free logics. We present a series of G3 sequent calculi adapted from Fjellstad (Studia Logica, 105(1), 93–119 2017, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 30(3), 272–289 2020), which possess all the desired structural properties of a good proof system, including admissibility of contraction and all versions of the cut rule. At the same time, we maintain the unified approach to free logics and moreover argue that greater clarity of intuitions is achieved once neutral free logic is conceptualized as consisting of two sub-varieties.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Journal of Philosophical Logic is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Journal of Philosophical Logic
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N