Rebel without a Cause: The Effects of Social Origins and Disposable Income on Rule Violations.

Are upper-class individuals more inclined to violate rules? Using behavioural data, recent studies have challenged the traditional assumption of upper social class members being less rule violating, while other studies find no or opposite effects. We bring together behavioural decision-making games...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Sociological Review Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 14 - 30
Autores principales: Armandola, Niccolò Giorgio, Ehlert, Alexander, Rauhut, Heiko
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Feb2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=162875093&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 162875093
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02667215
        BHY
      jtl: European Sociological Review
      issn: 02667215
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2023
      vid: 39
      iid: 1
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        162875093
        10.1093/esr/jcac016
      ppf: 14
      ppct: 16
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Rebel without a Cause: The Effects of Social Origins and Disposable Income on Rule Violations.
      aug:
        au:
          Armandola, Niccolò Giorgio
          Ehlert, Alexander
          Rauhut, Heiko
        affil: Department of Sociology, University of Zurich, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland
      su:
        Social status
        Social classes
        Poverty rate
        Poor communities
        Disposable income
      sug:
        subj:
          Social status
          Social classes
          Poverty rate
          Poor communities
          Disposable income
      ab: Are upper-class individuals more inclined to violate rules? Using behavioural data, recent studies have challenged the traditional assumption of upper social class members being less rule violating, while other studies find no or opposite effects. We bring together behavioural decision-making games with traditional survey measures in a unique setup to re-evaluate the proposed relation between social class and rule violations, distinguishing between the economic and the psychological components of social class. Drawing from a cohort of 750 Swiss adults, we investigate how the conditions they were born in (social origins) and the current financial resources (disposable income) affect self-reported and behaviourally measured rule violations in the lab. Interestingly, our findings show that disposable income impacts the behaviour of individuals conditional upon their social origins. For people with upper social origins an increase in disposable income leads to more rule violations than for people with lower social origins. Additional analyses show that a similar pattern emerges when analysing the different perceptions of morality that the two groups have. We conclude that with increasing disposable income, people with upper social origins become more morally flexible, as they are more tolerant of rule violations and violate the rules more often than individuals with lower social origins.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N