Comparative Effectiveness of Gua Sha, Cryostretch, and Positional Release Technique on Tenderness and Function in Subjects with Plantar Fasciitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Plantar fasciitis (PF) can be treated effectively with manual techniques like cryostretch (CS) and the positional release technique (PRT). Although Gua Sha (GS) has been suggested in the literature for PF, its efficacy has not been studied in the research. Objective: To determine and com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 13 - 24
Autores principales: Jadhav, Aditi, Gurudut, Peeyoosha
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Multimed Inc. Mar2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=162898290&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 162898290
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1916257X
        B0BY
      jtl: International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork
      issn: 1916257X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2023
      vid: 16
      iid: 1
      pid: 12545
      pub: Multimed Inc.
      place: Meaford, Ontario
    artinfo:
      ui:
        162898290
        162898290
        162898290
        10.3822/ijtmb.v16i1.749
        162898290
      ppf: 13
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Comparative Effectiveness of Gua Sha, Cryostretch, and Positional Release Technique on Tenderness and Function in Subjects with Plantar Fasciitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
      aug:
        au:
          Jadhav, Aditi
          Gurudut, Peeyoosha
        affil: Department of Orthopaedic Physiotherapy, KAHER's Institute of Physiotherapy, KLE Academy of Higher Education & Research, Karnataka, India
      sug:
        subj:
          Medicine, Chinese Traditional Evaluation
          Physical Therapy
          Stretching
          Manual Therapy Methods
          Muscle Pain Diagnosis
          Plantar Fasciitis Diagnosis
          Pain Measurement
          Pain Threshold
          Foot Physiopathology
          Treatment Outcomes
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Young Adult
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Random Assignment
          Costs and Cost Analysis
          Outpatient Service
          Tertiary Health Care
          Therapeutic Exercise
          Algometers Utilization
          Alternative Therapies Methods
          Spasm Prevention and Control
          Outcome Assessment
          Scales
          Descriptive Statistics
          Comparative Studies
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Plantar fasciitis (PF) can be treated effectively with manual techniques like cryostretch (CS) and the positional release technique (PRT). Although Gua Sha (GS) has been suggested in the literature for PF, its efficacy has not been studied in the research. Objective: To determine and compare the effectiveness of GS, CS, and PRT in subjects with PF in terms of pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, and foot function. Methods/Design: Thirty-six patients with PF (n=36) were randomly allocated to three study groups (12 in each group)--group GS, group CS, and group PRT, respectively. Settings: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at physiotherapy OPD in a tertiary health center. Participants: Subjects of all genders with plantar fasciitis of the age group 20-60 years. Thirty-six subjects with plantar fasciitis out of whom 12 were males and 24 females. There were no dropouts in this study. Intervention: The interventions included the Gua Sha technique (1 session), the cryostretch technique with a frozen tennis ball (3 sessions), and the positional release technique (7 sessions), along with common exercises for all three groups. Outcome Measures: Pain intensity, foot functions, and pain pressure threshold were assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Foot Function Index, and pressure algometer, respectively, on day 1 (pre-intervention) and day 7 (post-intervention). Results: Between-group analyses showed that group GS was more effective than CS and PRT for pain (p=.0001), group CS was more effective than GS and PRT for foot function (p=.0001) whereas group PRT was more effective than GS and CS for pain pressure threshold (p=.0001). Conclusion: Although all three groups showed improvement, Gua Sha was superior in terms of reducing pain, cryostretch for improving foot functions, and PRT for reducing tenderness. The interventions used in this study are cost-effective and have proved to be simple and safe techniques.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N