Direct observational time and motion study of the daily activities of hospital dispensary pharmacists and technicians.

Background: Hospital pharmacy dispensaries are busy work environments where staff are involved in a variety of work‐related tasks. The proportion of time spent on daily tasks, task prioritisation, multitasking, and interruptions remains largely unknown. Aim: To examine the tasks performed and propor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Pharmacy Practice & Research Vol. 53; no. 2; pp. 64 - 73
Autores principales: Magee, Katie, Fromont, Molly, Ihle, Eloise, Cheung, Michael, Percival, Mia, Poole, Susan G., Bell, Chloe, Theobald, Belinda, Dooley, Michael J., Brown, Catherine
Formato: CEU research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=162971825&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 162971825
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1445937X
        6CKV
      jtl: Journal of Pharmacy Practice & Research
      issn: 1445937X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2023
      vid: 53
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        162971825
        161507442
        162971825
        162971825
        10.1002/jppr.1852
        162971825
      ppf: 64
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Direct observational time and motion study of the daily activities of hospital dispensary pharmacists and technicians.
      aug:
        au:
          Magee, Katie
          Fromont, Molly
          Ihle, Eloise
          Cheung, Michael
          Percival, Mia
          Poole, Susan G.
          Bell, Chloe
          Theobald, Belinda
          Dooley, Michael J.
          Brown, Catherine
        affil: Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Pharmacists
          Pharmacy Technicians
          Pharmacy Service Evaluation
          Time Factors
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Workflow
          Human
          Education, Continuing (Credit)
          Time and Motion Studies
          Observational Methods
          Discharge Planning
          Interprofessional Relations
          Descriptive Statistics
      ab: Background: Hospital pharmacy dispensaries are busy work environments where staff are involved in a variety of work‐related tasks. The proportion of time spent on daily tasks, task prioritisation, multitasking, and interruptions remains largely unknown. Aim: To examine the tasks performed and proportion of time pharmacists and pharmacy technicians in a hospital pharmacy inpatient dispensary spend on various work‐related activities. Method: Pharmacists and technicians working in the inpatient dispensary of a large metropolitan health service were directly observed by trained researchers. Tasks were recorded using Work Observation Method By Activity Timing (WOMBAT), a validated technique developed for direct observation studies of health professionals. Timed tasks were allocated to domains detailing the task performed, who performed it, who they interacted with, and where the task was performed. Data were analysed descriptively with independence of 95% confidence intervals (CI) demonstrating statistical significance. Results: Twelve pharmacists and 13 technicians were observed for 107.4 h. Tasks that contributed the greatest proportion of time were: the preparation of discharge prescriptions: pharmacists 32.1% (95% CI 29.9–34.3%) and technicians 21.0% (95% CI 18.3–23.7%); inpatient medication supply 22.5% (95% CI 21.5–23.5%) and 49.3% (95% CI 47.3–51.3%) and; inter‐professional communication 13.6% and 14.7% (non‐significant [NS]). Tasks were completed independently 89.6% (pharmacists) and 88.9% (technicians) of the time. Pharmacists and technicians were interrupted 6.7 and 5.1 times per hour (p < 0.05), respectively; 8.6% and 9.5% (NS) of the time was spent undertaking at least two tasks simultaneously. Conclusion: This is the first study to examine task time distribution within a hospital inpatient dispensary. Pharmacists and technicians spend the greatest proportion of time on direct medication dispensing‐related activities. This study demonstrates a high frequency of multitasking and interruptions, both of which are known risks for dispensing errors.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        CEU
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N