Blunted reward responsiveness prospectively predicts emotional distress when exposed to a naturalistic stressor.

Both stress and blunted reward responsiveness have been identified as core risk factors of depression. Whether blunted reward responsiveness increases psychological vulnerability to real‐life stress from a dynamic perspective (from stress reactivity to recovery) has not been investigated. By utilizi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal of Psychology Vol. 114; no. 2; pp. 376 - 393
Autores principales: Yan, Linlin, Kohn, Nils, Yi, Wei, Wang, Naiyi, Duan, Hongxia, Wu, Jianhui
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell May2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=162972092&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 162972092
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00071269
        BJP
      jtl: British Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00071269
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2023
      vid: 114
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        162972092
        10.1111/bjop.12625
      ppf: 376
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 967KB
      tig:
        atl: Blunted reward responsiveness prospectively predicts emotional distress when exposed to a naturalistic stressor.
      aug:
        au:
          Yan, Linlin
          Kohn, Nils
          Yi, Wei
          Wang, Naiyi
          Duan, Hongxia
          Wu, Jianhui
        affil:
          Center for Brain Disorder and Cognitive Science, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
          Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
          Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
          Lab for Educational Neuroscience, Center for Educational Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
          Shenzhen Institute of Neuroscience, Shenzhen, China
      su:
        Mental depression risk factors
        Self-evaluation
        Undergraduates
        Reward (Psychology)
        Student attitudes
        Anxiety
        Psychological distress
        Psychological stress
        Psychological vulnerability
        Risk assessment
        Research funding
        Longitudinal method
      sug:
        subj:
          Mental depression risk factors
          Self-evaluation
          Undergraduates
          Reward (Psychology)
          Student attitudes
          Anxiety
          Psychological distress
          Psychological stress
          Psychological vulnerability
          Risk assessment
          Research funding
          Longitudinal method
      keyword:
        anxiety
        depression
        event‐related potentials
        reward positivity
        stress
        vulnerability
        anxiety
        depression
        event‐related potentials
        reward positivity
        stress
        vulnerability
      ab: Both stress and blunted reward responsiveness have been identified as core risk factors of depression. Whether blunted reward responsiveness increases psychological vulnerability to real‐life stress from a dynamic perspective (from stress reactivity to recovery) has not been investigated. By utilizing a real‐world stressful event (i.e. the final examination), this study aimed to explore the role of reward responsiveness in the stress‐emotional distress relationship during stress reactivity and recovery phases. We followed 57 undergraduates with three assessments, from six weeks before examination weeks (T1, baseline), one day before the examinations (T2) to two weeks after the examinations (T3), therefore, covering stress reactivity (T1 to T2) and recovery (T2 to T3) phases. At baseline, reward responsiveness was measured as the Reward Positivity (RewP) in the doors task. Stress and emotional distress (anxiety and depression) were reported at T1, T2 and T3 to capture their dynamic changes. Results showed that self‐report stress levels significantly increased from T1 to T2 (stress reactivity phase) and decreased from T2 to T3 (stress recovery phase). Furthermore, blunted reward responsiveness at baseline prospectively predicted emotional distress during the stress reactivity phase but not the recovery phase. Specifically, during the stress reactivity phase, higher perceived stress was associated with greater anxiety and depression only in participants with relatively smaller residual RewP amplitudes but not in participants with relatively larger residual RewP amplitudes. Our study demonstrated that a blunted reward responsiveness is a vulnerable factor of depression, especially when exposed to stress. Our findings provide insights into prevention and intervention for stress‐related disturbance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N