Influential Factors and Preliminary Reference Data for a Clinically Feasible, Functional Reaction Time Assessment: The Standardized Assessment of Reaction Time.

Clinical reaction-time (RT) measures are frequently used when examining patients with concussion but do not correlate with functional movement RT. We developed the Standardized Assessment of RT (StART) to emulate the rapid cognitive demands and whole-body movement needed in sport. To assess StART di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Athletic Training (KnowledgeWorks Global, Ltd) Vol. 58; no. 2; pp. 112 - 120
Main Authors: Lempke, Landon B., Oldham, Jessie R., Passalugo, Scott, Willwerth, Sarah B., Berkstresser, Brant, Wang, Francis, Howell, David R., Meehan III, William P.
Format: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: KnowledgeWorks Global, Ltd Feb2023
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=163025350&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 163025350
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10626050
        HB36
      jtl: Journal of Athletic Training (KnowledgeWorks Global, Ltd)
      issn: 10626050
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2023
      vid: 58
      iid: 2
      pid: 81084
      pub: KnowledgeWorks Global, Ltd
      place: Richmond, Virginia
    artinfo:
      ui:
        163025350
        163025350
        163025350
        10.4085/1062-6050-0073.22
        163025350
      ppf: 112
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Influential Factors and Preliminary Reference Data for a Clinically Feasible, Functional Reaction Time Assessment: The Standardized Assessment of Reaction Time.
      aug:
        au:
          Lempke, Landon B.
          Oldham, Jessie R.
          Passalugo, Scott
          Willwerth, Sarah B.
          Berkstresser, Brant
          Wang, Francis
          Howell, David R.
          Meehan III, William P.
        affil: Division of Sports Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, MA
      sug:
        subj:
          Brain Injuries Rehabilitation
          Functional Assessment
          Reaction Time Evaluation
          Cognition
          Athletic Training
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Sports Re-Entry
          Human
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Prospective Studies
          Athletes, College
          Confidence Intervals
          Descriptive Statistics
          Age Factors
          Sex Factors
          Female
          Male
          Analysis of Variance
          Female
          Male
      ab: Clinical reaction-time (RT) measures are frequently used when examining patients with concussion but do not correlate with functional movement RT. We developed the Standardized Assessment of RT (StART) to emulate the rapid cognitive demands and whole-body movement needed in sport. To assess StART differences across 6 cognitive-motor combinations, examine potential demographic and health history confounders, and provide preliminary reference data for healthy collegiate student-athletes. Prospective, cross-sectional study. Clinical medicine facilities. A total of 89 student-athletes (56 [62.9%] men, 33 [37.1%] women; age = 19.5 ± 0.9 years, height = 178.2 ± 21.7 cm, mass = 80.4 ± 24 kg; no concussion history = 64 [71.9%]). Student-athletes completed health history questionnaires and StART during preseason testing. The StART consisted of 3 movements (standing, single-legged balance, and cutting) under 2 cognitive states (single task and dual task [subtracting by 6's or 7's]) for 3 trials under each condition. The StART trials were calculated as milliseconds between penlight illumination and initial movement. We used a 3 × 2 repeated-measures analysis of variance with post hoc t tests and 95% CIs to assess StART cognitive and movement differences, conducted univariable linear regressions to examine StART performance associations, and reported StART performance as percentiles. All StART conditions differed (P ≤.03), except single-task standing versus single-task single-legged balance (P =.36). Every 1-year age increase was associated with an 18-millisecond (95% CI = 8, 27 milliseconds) slower single-task cutting RT (P <.001). Female athletes had slower single-task (15 milliseconds; 95% CI = 2, 28 milliseconds; P =.02) and dual-task (28 milliseconds; 95% CI = 2, 55 milliseconds; P =.03) standing RT than male athletes. No other demographic or health history factors were associated with any StART condition (P ≥.056). The StART outcomes were unique across each cognitive-motor combination, suggesting minimal subtest redundancy. Only age and sex were associated with select outcomes. The StART composite scores may minimize confounding factors, but future researchers should consider age and sex when providing normative data.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N