PUBLIC RECORDS AREN’T PUBLIC: SYSTEMIC BARRIERS TO MEASURING COURT FUNCTIONING & EQUITY.

The article focuses on ethical implications of the lack of access to records that are legally public and considers how this lack of access to records becomes an access to justice problem. It mentions source of already legally public criminal data such as criminal jury trial transcripts and review of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Vol. 113; no. 1; pp. 1 - 35
Autores principales: ALBRECHT, KAT, FILIP, KAITLYN
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Northwestern University Winter2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=163093673&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 163093673
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00914169
        CLC
      jtl: Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology
      issn: 00914169
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Winter2023
      vid: 113
      iid: 1
      pid: 1093
      pub: Northwestern University
    artinfo:
      ui: 163093673
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 34
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 5.6MB
      tig:
        atl: PUBLIC RECORDS AREN’T PUBLIC: SYSTEMIC BARRIERS TO MEASURING COURT FUNCTIONING & EQUITY.
      aug:
        au:
          ALBRECHT, KAT
          FILIP, KAITLYN
        affil:
          Assistant Professor at Georgia State University.
          Law & Humanities Fellow at Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law.
          Rhetoric and Public Culture at Northwestern University.
      su:
        Access to justice
        Jury trials
        Criminal trials
        Court records
        Management of public records
      sug:
        subj:
          Access to justice
          Jury trials
          Criminal trials
          Court records
          Management of public records
      ab: The article focuses on ethical implications of the lack of access to records that are legally public and considers how this lack of access to records becomes an access to justice problem. It mentions source of already legally public criminal data such as criminal jury trial transcripts and review of the legal limitations to public data access. It also mentions decision of Supreme Court's decision in the case Nixon v. Warner Communications on public has a right to access court records.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N