Do People With Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia Improve or Worsen Across Repeated Sequential Word Trials?

Purpose: During motor speech examinations for suspected apraxia of speech (AOS), clients are routinely asked to repeat words several times sequentially. The purpose of this study was to understand the task in terms of the relationship among consecutive attempts. We asked to what extent phonemic accu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 66; no. 4; pp. 1240 - 1252
Main Authors: Haley, Katarina L., Jacks, Adam, Richardson, Jessica D., Harmon, Tyson G., Lacey, Elizabeth H., Turkeltau, Peter
Format: Article
Published: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Apr2023
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=163147704&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 163147704
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2023
      vid: 66
      iid: 4
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        163147704
        10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00438
      ppf: 1240
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 704KB
      tig:
        atl: Do People With Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia Improve or Worsen Across Repeated Sequential Word Trials?
      aug:
        au:
          Haley, Katarina L.
          Jacks, Adam
          Richardson, Jessica D.
          Harmon, Tyson G.
          Lacey, Elizabeth H.
          Turkeltau, Peter
        affil:
          Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Department of Allied Health Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
          Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
          Department of Communication Disorders, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
          Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, and MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC.
      su:
        Task performance
        Sound recordings
        Phonetics
        Diagnosis of aphasia
        Nonparametric statistics
        Speech apraxia
        Speech evaluation
        Descriptive statistics
        Research funding
      sug:
        subj:
          Task performance
          Sound recordings
          Phonetics
          Sound recording merchant wholesalers
          Record Production
          Integrated Record Production/Distribution
          Diagnosis of aphasia
          Nonparametric statistics
          Speech apraxia
          Speech evaluation
          Descriptive statistics
          Research funding
      ab: Purpose: During motor speech examinations for suspected apraxia of speech (AOS), clients are routinely asked to repeat words several times sequentially. The purpose of this study was to understand the task in terms of the relationship among consecutive attempts. We asked to what extent phonemic accuracy changes across trials and whether the change is predicted by AOS diagnosis and sound production severity. Method: One hundred thirty-three participants were assigned to four diagnostic groups based on quantitative metrics (aphasia plus AOS, aphasia-only, and aphasia with two borderline speech profiles). Each participant produced four multisyllabic words 5 times consecutively. These productions were audio-recorded and transcribed phonetically and then summarized as the proportion of target phonemes that was produced accurately. Nonparametric statistics were used to analyze percent change in accuracy from the first to the last production based on diagnostic group and a broad measure of speech sound accuracy. Results: Accuracy on the repeated words deteriorated across trials for all groups, showing reduced accuracy from the first to the last repetition for 62% of participants. Although diagnostic groups differed on the broad measure of speech sound accuracy, severity classification based on this measure did not determine degree of deterioration on the repeated words task. Discussion: Responding to a request to say multisyllabic words 5 times sequentially is challenging for people with aphasia with and without AOS, and as such, performance is prone to errors even with mild impairment. For most, the task does not encourage self-correction. Instead, it promotes errors, regardless of diagnosis, and is, therefore, useful for screening purposes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N