Comparison of In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implants.
Background. Peri-implant diseases are emerging issues in contemporary implant dentistry. As biofilms play a critical role in peri-implant diseases, the characteristic of resisting bacterial adhesion would be ideal for dental implants. The aims of the study were to compare titanium (Ti) and zirconia...
| Publicado en: | BioMed Research International pp. 1 - 8 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
4/15/2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=163167810&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 163167810 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 23146133 FT2T jtl: BioMed Research International issn: 23146133 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 4/15/2023 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 163167810 163167810 163167810 10.1155/2023/8728499 163167810 ppf: 1 ppct: 7 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Comparison of In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implants. aug: au: Chiou, Lan-Lin Panariello, Beatriz H. D. Hamada, Yusuke Gregory, Richard L. Blanchard, Steven Duarte, Simone affil: Department of Periodontology, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA sug: subj: Biofilms Titanium Metals, Heavy Dental Implants In Vitro Studies Streptococcus Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Two-Way Analysis of Variance Data Analysis Software ab: Background. Peri-implant diseases are emerging issues in contemporary implant dentistry. As biofilms play a critical role in peri-implant diseases, the characteristic of resisting bacterial adhesion would be ideal for dental implants. The aims of the study were to compare titanium (Ti) and zirconia (Zr) implants regarding the amount of biofilm formation at different time frames and assess the distribution of biofilm on different aspects of dental implants. Methods. Biofilm was developed on Ti and Zr dental implants with a peri-implant-related multispecies model with Streptococcus oralis, Actinomyces naeslundii, Veillonella dispar, and Porphyromonas gingivalis, for 3 and 14 days. Quantitative assessment was performed with the measurement of total bacterial viability (colony forming units, CFU/mg). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to evaluate biofilm formation on different aspects of the implants. Results. Three-day-old biofilm on Ti implants was significantly higher than that on Zr implants (p < 0.001). The Ti and Zr groups were not significantly different for 14-day-old biofilm. SEM images demonstrated that 3-day-old biofilm on Zr implants was sparse while biofilm growth was more pronounced for 3-day-old biofilm on Ti implants and 14-day-old biofilm groups. It appeared that less biofilm formed on the valley compared to the thread top for 3-day-old biofilm on Zr implants. Differences between the valley and the thread top became indistinguishable with the development of mature biofilm. Conclusion. While early formed biofilms show greater accumulation on Ti implants compared to Zr implants, older biofilms between the two groups are comparable. The distribution of biofilms was not uniform on different areas of implant threads during early biofilm development. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|