The Etiquette of Equality.
And just as Shapiro was thus right to apologize for his conduct (under this description), I think Georgetown's dean could reasonably have made a careful statement faulting Shapiro for that same lapse - including by highlighting the damage that Shapiro's speech had done to the institutional interest...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy & Public Affairs Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 97 - 140 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Spring2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=163191349&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 163191349 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00483915 PPA jtl: Philosophy & Public Affairs issn: 00483915 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Spring2023 vid: 51 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 163191349 10.1111/papa.12230 ppf: 97 ppct: 43 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 326KB tig: atl: The Etiquette of Equality. aug: au: Eidelson, Benjamin su: Gesture Etiquette Cultural pluralism Microaggressions Equality Jim Crow laws Social status sug: subj: Gesture Etiquette Cultural pluralism Microaggressions Equality Jim Crow laws Social status ab: And just as Shapiro was thus right to apologize for his conduct (under this description), I think Georgetown's dean could reasonably have made a careful statement faulting Shapiro for that same lapse - including by highlighting the damage that Shapiro's speech had done to the institutional interest in maintaining a public culture of mutual recognition. After all, a professor might ask students where they are from just by way of small talk, and an Asian-American student would presumably have no reason to find the question troubling if they knew that the professor asks white students the same thing. Given the students' lack of assurance about their status, that is a demonstration that the students have legitimate reasons to want, and that the institution has genuine moral reasons to provide - especially if the alternative, at least relative to the prevailing interpretive norms, is for the institution to convey that it condones the students' felt marginalization. But we should not rush to conclude that the students (and others) who were aggrieved by Shapiro's statement so misunderstood or miscast their own complaint - and indeed, there are other salient reasons for taking offense at Shapiro's statement that I do i relate to the additional content that the critics emphasized. Ideally, one might want to acknowledge the affront that I have just described, and reassure offended students of their standing, I without i reinforcing the interpretive background conditions that made Shapiro's statement so problematic in the first place - conditions that left students vulnerable to the injury that now needs repairing and, at the same time, threaten the very possibility of respectful engagement on controversial topics of obvious importance. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy & Public Affairs is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy & Public Affairs holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|