Another implementation science is possible: engaging an 'intelligent public' in knowledge translation.
As the world contends with the COVID-19 pandemic, scientific expertise has permeated political discourse and the phrase 'following the science' is being used to build trust and justify government decision-making. This phrase reflects a problematic assumption that there is one objective science to fo...
| Publicado en: | Health Sociology Review Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 5 - 19 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | review Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Mar2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=163231156&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 163231156 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14461242 1H4V jtl: Health Sociology Review issn: 14461242 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2023 vid: 32 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 163231156 162293520 163231156 163231156 10.1080/14461242.2023.2174897 163231156 ppf: 5 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Another implementation science is possible: engaging an 'intelligent public' in knowledge translation. aug: au: Heinsch, Milena Cootes, Hannah Tickner, Campbell affil: School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australila sug: subj: Knowledge Communication Interpersonal Relations Implementation Science COVID-19 Pandemic Politics Social Justice Medical Practice, Evidence-Based Decision Making ab: As the world contends with the COVID-19 pandemic, scientific expertise has permeated political discourse and the phrase 'following the science' is being used to build trust and justify government decision-making. This phrase reflects a problematic assumption that there is one objective science to follow and that the use of scientific knowledge in decision-making is inherently neutral. In this article, we examine more closely the dense and intricate relationships, values, politics, and interests that determine whose knowledge counts, who gets to speak, who is spoken for, and with what consequences, in the translation of scientific knowledge. Drawing key insights from Stengers' Manifesto for Slow Science, we argue that implementation science has a central role to play in problematising the historic dominance of certain voices and institutional structures that have come to symbolise trust, rigour, and knowledge. Yet to date, implementation science has tended to overlook these economic, social, historical, and political forces. Fraser's conception of social justice and Jasanoff's 'technologies of humility' are introduced as useful frameworks to extend the capacity of implementation science to engage the broader public as an 'intelligent public' in the translation of knowledge, during and beyond the pandemic. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: review Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|