Safety and Feasibility of Noninvasive Electromagnetic Stimulation of the Phrenic Nerves.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation is widely used in ICU patients as a lifesaving intervention. Diaphragmatic atrophy and thinning occur from lack of contractions of the diaphragm during mechanical ventilation. It may prolong weaning and increase the risk of respiratory complications. Noninvasive el...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 68; no. 5; pp. 602 - 611
Autores principales: Mueller, Gabi, Aszalos, Elöd, Krause, Sven, Niederhauser, Thomas, Slavei, Krisztina, Baumberger, Michael E.
Formato: equations & formulas pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. May2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=163323493&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 163323493
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2023
      vid: 68
      iid: 5
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        163323493
        163323493
        163323493
        10.4187/respcare.10568
        163323493
      ppf: 602
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Safety and Feasibility of Noninvasive Electromagnetic Stimulation of the Phrenic Nerves.
      aug:
        au:
          Mueller, Gabi
          Aszalos, Elöd
          Krause, Sven
          Niederhauser, Thomas
          Slavei, Krisztina
          Baumberger, Michael E.
        affil: Clinical Trial Unit, Swiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland
      sug:
        subj:
          Phrenic Nerve Physiology
          Electromagnetics
          Electric Stimulation
          Patient Safety
          Noninvasive Procedures
          Treatment Outcomes
          Anesthesia
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Pilot Studies
          Diaphragm
          Electromagnetic Fields Equipment and Supplies
          Health Screening
          Patient Assessment
          Descriptive Statistics
          Outcome Assessment
          Data Analysis Software
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation is widely used in ICU patients as a lifesaving intervention. Diaphragmatic atrophy and thinning occur from lack of contractions of the diaphragm during mechanical ventilation. It may prolong weaning and increase the risk of respiratory complications. Noninvasive electromagnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves may ameliorate the atrophy seen with ventilation. The objective of this study was to show that noninvasive repetitive electromagnetic stimulation is safe, feasible, and effective to stimulate the phrenic nerves in both awake individuals and anesthetized patients. METHODS: A single-center study with 10 subjects overall, 5 awake volunteers and 5 anesthetized subjects. We used a prototype electromagnetic, noninvasive, simultaneous bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation device in both groups. In the awake volunteers, we assessed time-to-first capture of the phrenic nerves and safety measures, such as pain, discomfort, dental paresthesia, and skin irritation. In the anesthetized subjects, time-to-first capture as well as tidal volumes and airway pressures at 20%, 30%, and 40% stimulation intensity were assessed. RESULTS: Diaphragmatic capture was achieved in all the subjects within a median (range) of 1 min (1 min to 9 min 21 s) for the awake subjects and 30 s (20 s to 1 min 15 s) for the anesthetized subjects. There were no adverse or severe adverse events in either group, nor any dental paresthesia, skin irritation, or subjective pain in the stimulated area. Tidal volumes increased in all the subjects in response to simultaneous bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation and increased gradually with increasing stimulation intensity. Airway pressures corresponded to spontaneous breathing of ~2 cm H2O. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive phrenic nerve stimulation can be safely performed in awake and anesthetized individuals. It was feasible and effective in stimulating the diaphragm by induction of physiologic and scalable tidal volumes with minimum positive airway pressures.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        equations & formulas
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N