Shortened Automatic Lung Recruitment Maneuvers in an In Vivo Model of Neonatal ARDS.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of 2 protocols for automatic lung recruitment maneuvers (LRMs) using stepwise increases in PEEP in a neonatal ARDS model. These protocols were designed with lower maximum opening pressures than traditional methods and differ eac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 68; no. 5; pp. 628 - 638
Autores principales: Guilló-Moreno, Verónica, Gutiérrez-Martínez, Alberto, Serrano-Zueras, Clara, Santos-González, Martín, Romero-Berrocal, Antonio, García-Fernández, Javier
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. May2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=163323496&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 163323496
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2023
      vid: 68
      iid: 5
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        163323496
        163323496
        163323496
        10.4187/respcare.10438
        163323496
      ppf: 628
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Shortened Automatic Lung Recruitment Maneuvers in an In Vivo Model of Neonatal ARDS.
      aug:
        au:
          Guilló-Moreno, Verónica
          Gutiérrez-Martínez, Alberto
          Serrano-Zueras, Clara
          Santos-González, Martín
          Romero-Berrocal, Antonio
          García-Fernández, Javier
        affil: Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Spain
      sug:
        subj:
          Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn Therapy
          Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Methods
          Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Adverse Effects
          Respiration, Artificial Adverse Effects
          Hemodynamics Evaluation
          Treatment Outcomes Evaluation
          Protocols
          Animal Studies
          Swine
          Models, Biological
          Prospective Studies
          Experimental Studies
          Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
          Regression
          In Vivo Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Monitoring, Physiologic
          Data Analysis Software
          Confidence Intervals
          Comparative Studies
      ab: BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of 2 protocols for automatic lung recruitment maneuvers (LRMs) using stepwise increases in PEEP in a neonatal ARDS model. These protocols were designed with lower maximum opening pressures than traditional methods and differ each one in the duration of the opening phases (short vs prolonged). We described hemodynamic changes through invasive monitoring, and we analyzed if the behavior of the variables depends on the duration of the opening phase of the LRM. METHODS: We designed a prospective, experimental study with 10 Landrace x Large White pigs < 48 h old. Under general anesthesia, tracheal intubation, invasive hemodynamic monitoring with a pediatric arterial thermodilution catheter was performed. An ARDS model was developed with bronchoalveolar lavages. Two types of LRMs were performed in each piglet, with a maximum peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) of 30 cm H2O and a PEEP 15 cm H2O applied during 8.5 s in the short LRM and 17 s in the prolonged LRM. A comparative analysis by virtue of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a regression analysis using generalized estimation equation were performed. RESULTS: We found that both LRMs were effective regarding oxygenation and respiratory mechanics. Shortening the duration of the opening phase and lowering the maximum opening pressures to PIP 30 and PEEP 15 cm H2O were above the critical opening pressure to reverse alveolar collapse in our neonatal ARDS model. Although we observed hemodynamic variations during both types of LRMs, these were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our LRM protocols exceeded critical opening pressures to reverse alveolar collapse in our neonatal ARDS model. This range of pressures might involve less hemodynamic disturbance. Duration of the maximum opening pressure step is a determining factor for hemodynamic alterations.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N