Apie realybę ir įstatymą, arba ką veikė Platonas Sirakūzuose?
The article critically reconsiders the attitude of Giorgio Agamben, which indicate the “unreality” of the action denoted by the term “realization” as opposite to reality. This question is primarily projected into Hegel’s philosophy, in which reality is not equated with actuality (Wirklichkeit) and r...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos pp. 44 - 56 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2022 Supplement
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=163399553&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 163399553 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2022 Supplement pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 163399553 10.15388/Problemos.Priedas.22.4 ppf: 44 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.5MB tig: atl: Apie realybę ir įstatymą, arba ką veikė Platonas Sirakūzuose? aug: au: Šerpytytė, Rita affil: Vilniaus universiteto Filosofijos institutas. su: Agamben, Giorgio, 1942- Metaphysics Attitude (Psychology) Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 1770-1831 Aristotle, 384-322 B.C. sug: subj: Agamben, Giorgio, 1942- Metaphysics Attitude (Psychology) Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 1770-1831 Aristotle, 384-322 B.C. keyword: actuality law Realität reality realization įstatymas Realität realizacija realybė tikrovė Wirklichkeit ab: The article critically reconsiders the attitude of Giorgio Agamben, which indicate the “unreality” of the action denoted by the term “realization” as opposite to reality. This question is primarily projected into Hegel’s philosophy, in which reality is not equated with actuality (Wirklichkeit) and realization with actualization. It is considered what could be the basis of such Agamben’s approach, which does not see the need to distinguish between reality (Realität) and actuality (Wirklichkeit). The reliance on Aristotle’s metaphysics, the division of dynamis and energeia is of crucial importance in Agamben’s philosophy. It is this point that allows Agamben to apply the term “reality” to only ontologically treated realtà and at the same time contrast it with the movement of an ontic nature – realization. When raising the question – what does it mean to realize laws? – the controversial relationship between the law and reality is considered. Straipsnyje kritiškai permąstomos Giorgio Agambeno nuostatos, nurodančios realizacijos terminu žymimo veiksmo „nerealumą“, priešingumą realybei. Šis klausimas pirmiausia projektuojamas į Hegelio filosofiją, kurioje realybė nėra sutapatinama su tikrove, o realizacija – su tapimu tikrove / įsitikrovinimu. Svarstoma, koks galėtų būti tokio Agambeno požiūrio, kuris nemato būtinybės atskirti realybę ir tikrovę, pagrindas. Esmingą reikšmę Agambeno filosofijoje turi jo atsirėmimas į Aristotelio metafiziką, jo dynamis ir energeia perskyrą. Būtent šis atramos taškas Agambenui leidžia realybės terminą taikyti vien ontologiškai traktuojamai tikrovei ir sykiu supriešinti ją su ontinio pobūdžio judesiu – realizacija. Keliant klausimą – ką reiškia realizuoti, įgyvendinti įstatymus, svarstomas kontroversiškas įstatymo santykis su tikrove. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|