The Roads of the Others: E. Levinas and T. Adorno.
In this article, Levinas’ philosophy is interpreted as an ethical and Talmudic consideration of existential paths. After Auschwitz, the concept of otherness and the diversity of other faces presupposes a free and diverse “being on the road,” an ethics of journey, and denies theodicy and an essential...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos pp. 69 - 85 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2022 Supplement
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=163399555&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 163399555 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2022 Supplement pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 163399555 10.15388/Problemos.Priedas.22.6 ppf: 69 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.8MB tig: atl: The Roads of the Others: E. Levinas and T. Adorno. aug: au: Mažeikis, Gintautas affil: Institute of Philosophy, Vilnius University Department of Philosophy, Vytautas Magnus University. su: Auschwitz concentration camp Essentialism (Philosophy) Theodicy Other (Philosophy) Ethics Roads sug: subj: Auschwitz concentration camp Essentialism (Philosophy) Theodicy Other (Philosophy) Ethics Roads keyword: Adorno Exodus Gulag Holocaust Levinas Negative Theodicy egzodas gulagas Holokaustas Levinas, negatyvi teodicėja ab: In this article, Levinas’ philosophy is interpreted as an ethical and Talmudic consideration of existential paths. After Auschwitz, the concept of otherness and the diversity of other faces presupposes a free and diverse “being on the road,” an ethics of journey, and denies theodicy and an essentialist interpretation of being. The thesis is proven by comparing Levinas’, Baranova’s and Adorno’s approaches to ethics and Exegesis. Levinas’ philosophy is elaborated by referring to the exegetics of the Exodus and the concept of an incomprehensibility of Auschwitz. The author discusses the philosophies of Levinas and Adorno who both consider the Holocaust as an occurrence not open to interpretation. Levinas advocates the end of theodicy as a justification for divine history and argues the primacy of ethics, while Adorno develops anti-theodicy and presents the relevance of critique of instrumental reason. Straipsnyje Levino filosofija interpretuojama kaip etinis ir talmudinis egzistencinių kelių svarstymas. Autorius teigia, kad kitoniškumo ir kitų veidų įvairovės samprata po Aušvico neigia teodicėją ir esencialistinę būties interpretaciją, tačiau suponuoja įvairiapusę „buvimo kelyje“ etiką. Straipsnis lygina Levino, Baranovos ir Adorno požiūrius į etiką ir egzegezę. Levino filosofija plėtojama remiantis egzodo egzegetika ir Aušvico nesuvokiamumo samprata. Autorius aptaria Levino ir Adorno filosofijas, kurie abu laiko Holokaustą įvykiu, kurio negalima suvokti. Levinas pasisako už teodicijos kaip dieviškosios istorijos pateisinimo pabaigą ir įrodinėja etikos pirmumą, o Adorno plėtoja antiteodicėją ir pateikia instrumentinio proto kritikos aktualumą. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|