The Break between Old and New Orders in Laclau’s Theory of Hegemony.
Drawing inspiration from Alain Badiou’s philosophical project of thinking radical change and novelty, this paper raises the question of whether Ernesto Laclau’s theory of hegemony provides an adequate conceptualization of social change. Laclau claims that the transition between old and new hegemonic...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 103; pp. 35 - 51 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=163401436&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 163401436 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2023 vid: 103 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 163401436 10.15388/Problemos.2023.103.3 ppf: 35 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.8MB tig: atl: The Break between Old and New Orders in Laclau’s Theory of Hegemony. aug: au: Kim, Min Seong affil: Sanata Dharma University. su: Laclau, Ernesto, 1935-2014 Badiou, Alain, 1937- Hegemony Social order Social change Inspiration sug: subj: Laclau, Ernesto, 1935-2014 Badiou, Alain, 1937- Hegemony Social order Social change Inspiration keyword: Alain Badiou Ernesto Laclau radical break social change theory of hegemony Alainas Badiou hegemonijos teorija radikalus lūžis socialinis pokytis ab: Drawing inspiration from Alain Badiou’s philosophical project of thinking radical change and novelty, this paper raises the question of whether Ernesto Laclau’s theory of hegemony provides an adequate conceptualization of social change. Laclau claims that the transition between old and new hegemonic formations constitutes a “radical break.” However, it shall be shown that Laclau’s claim apropos radical break is in tension with his elaboration of the conditions under which a particularity – including particular political projects or social orders – may become hegemonic. As a result, how a process of transformation is to be conceptually distinguished from a process of reproduction is left unclear within the hegemony theory. Atskaitos tašku laikydamas Alaino Badiou mąstymo apie radikalius pokyčius ir naujoves filosofinį projektą, šis straipsnis iškelia klausimą, ar Ernesto Laclau hegemonijos teorija socialiniam pokyčiui suteikia adekvačią konceptualizaciją. Laclau teigia, kad perėjimas nuo senųjų prie naujųjų hegemoninių struktūrų reiškia radikalų lūžį. Tačiau šis straipsnis atskleidžia, kad Laclau teiginys apie radikalų lūžį sunkiai dera su tuo, kaip jis aiškina sąlygas, kurioms susidarius, tam tikras specifiškumas (įskaitant konkrečius politinius projektus ar socialines tvarkas) gali tapti dominuojantis. Tai lemia, kad hegemonijos teorijos kontekste lieka neaišku, kaip įmanoma transformacijos procesą konceptualiai atskirti nuo reprodukcijos proceso. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|