Dual-Task Paradigm Measures of Listening Effort: To Include or Not to Include Secondary Task Responses with Incorrect Primary Task Responses.
Response time–based dual-task paradigms are commonly adopted to measure behavioral listening effort. Most extant studies used an all-response approach that included secondary task responses under both correct and incorrect primary task responses during analysis. However, evidence supporting this str...
| Publicado en: | Seminars in Hearing Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 155 - 166 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishing Inc.
May2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=163408670&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 163408670 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 07340451 GQL jtl: Seminars in Hearing issn: 07340451 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2023 vid: 44 iid: 2 pid: 2811 pub: Thieme Medical Publishing Inc. place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 163408670 163408670 163408670 10.1055/s-0043-1766140 163408670 ppf: 155 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: Dual-Task Paradigm Measures of Listening Effort: To Include or Not to Include Secondary Task Responses with Incorrect Primary Task Responses. aug: au: Huang, Haiping Oosthuizen, Ilze Picou, Erin M. affil: Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, 1215 21st Avenue S, Room 8310, Nashville, TN 37232 sug: subj: Task Performance and Analysis Listening Effort Evaluation Noise Reaction Time Evaluation Speech Perception Evaluation Human Young Adult Adult Analysis of Variance Comparative Studies Female Descriptive Research Repeated Measures Descriptive Statistics Data Analysis Software Effect Size Self Report Audiometry Confidence Intervals Language Tests Clinical Assessment Tools Adult: 19-44 years Female ab: Response time–based dual-task paradigms are commonly adopted to measure behavioral listening effort. Most extant studies used an all-response approach that included secondary task responses under both correct and incorrect primary task responses during analysis. However, evidence supporting this strategy is limited. Therefore, the current study investigated the potential differences between including all responses versus only including correct responses. Data from two previous studies were reanalyzed. Experiment 1 included 16 listeners and used a dual-task paradigm to examine the effect of introducing background noise on listening effort. Experiment 2 included 19 participants and used a different dual-task paradigm to examine the effect of reverberation and loudspeaker-to-listener distance on listening effort. ANOVA results obtained using both analysis approaches were compared. The all-response and correct-only approaches revealed similar results. However, larger effect sizes and an additional main effect were found with the all-response approach. The current study supports the use of an all-response approach due to its greater sensitivity to changes in behavioral listening effort. However, a correct-only approach could be utilized to suit specific study purposes. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|