Item Response Theory Modeling of the Verb Naming Test.

Purpose: Item response theory (IRT) is a modern psychometric framework with several advantageous properties as compared with classical test theory. IRT has been successfully used to model performance on anomia tests in individuals with aphasia; however, all efforts to date have focused on noun produ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 66; pp. 1718 - 1740
Main Authors: Fergadiotis, Gerasimos, Casilio, Marianne, Dickey, Michael Walsh, Steel, Stacey, Nicholson, Hannele, Fleegle, Mikala, Swiderski, Alexander, Hula, William D.
Format: Article
Published: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association May2023
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=163674962&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 163674962
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2023
      vid: 66
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        163674962
        10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00458
      ppf: 1718
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.7MB
      tig:
        atl: Item Response Theory Modeling of the Verb Naming Test.
      aug:
        au:
          Fergadiotis, Gerasimos
          Casilio, Marianne
          Dickey, Michael Walsh
          Steel, Stacey
          Nicholson, Hannele
          Fleegle, Mikala
          Swiderski, Alexander
          Hula, William D.
        affil:
          Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, OR.
          Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
          Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
          VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, PA.
          U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Minneapolis Healthcare System, MN.
      su:
        Comparative grammar
        Psychometrics
        Psychological tests
        Terms & phrases
        Diagnosis of aphasia
        Research evaluation
        Confidence intervals
        Mathematical models
        Research methodology evaluation
        Research methodology
        Speech evaluation
        Multitrait multimethod techniques
        Inter-observer reliability
        Theory
        Anomia
        Research funding
        Factor analysis
        Descriptive statistics
        Chi-squared test
        Statistical models
      sug:
        subj:
          Comparative grammar
          Psychometrics
          Psychological tests
          Terms & phrases
          Diagnosis of aphasia
          Research evaluation
          Confidence intervals
          Mathematical models
          Research methodology evaluation
          Research methodology
          Speech evaluation
          Multitrait multimethod techniques
          Inter-observer reliability
          Theory
          Anomia
          Research funding
          Factor analysis
          Descriptive statistics
          Chi-squared test
          Statistical models
      ab: Purpose: Item response theory (IRT) is a modern psychometric framework with several advantageous properties as compared with classical test theory. IRT has been successfully used to model performance on anomia tests in individuals with aphasia; however, all efforts to date have focused on noun production accuracy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the Verb Naming Test (VNT), a prominent test of action naming, can be successfully modeled under IRT and evaluate its reliability. Method: We used responses on the VNT from 107 individuals with chronic aphasia from AphasiaBank. Unidimensionality and local independence, two assumptions prerequisite to IRT modeling, were evaluated using factor analysis and Yen’s Q statistic (Yen, 1984), respectively. The assumption of equal discrimination among test items was evaluated statistically via nested model comparisons and practically by using correlations of resulting IRT-derived scores. Finally, internal consistency, marginal and empirical reliability, and conditional reliability were evaluated. Results: The VNT was found to be sufficiently unidimensional with the majority of item pairs demonstrating adequate local independence. An IRT model in which item discriminations are constrained to be equal demonstrated fit equivalent to a model in which unique discrimination parameters were estimated for each item. All forms of reliability were strong across the majority of IRT ability estimates. Conclusions: Modeling the VNT using IRT is feasible, yielding ability estimates that are both informative and reliable. Future efforts are needed to quantify the validity of the VNT under IRT and determine the extent to which it measures the same construct as other anomia tests.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N