EXPLANATORY PROBLEMS FOR MASS ADDITIVITY AND DYNAMICS.

I present an argument against the view that the additivity of mass (i.e., the property according to which a composite object's mass is the "sum" of its parts') is metaphysically independent of dynamical laws governing massive bodies. In particular, taking additivity to be independent of dynamics com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Crítica Vol. 55; no. 163; pp. 45 - 81
Main Author: PERRY, ZEE R.
Format: Article
Published: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosoficas abr2023
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=163733011&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 163733011
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00111503
        H9Y
      jtl: Crítica
      issn: 00111503
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: abr2023
      vid: 55
      iid: 163
      pid: 10429
      pub: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosoficas
    artinfo:
      ui:
        163733011
        10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2023.1408
      ppf: 45
      ppct: 36
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.2MB
      tig:
        atl: EXPLANATORY PROBLEMS FOR MASS ADDITIVITY AND DYNAMICS.
      aug:
        au: PERRY, ZEE R.
        affil: University of Birmingham Philosophy Department
      su:
        Additivity (Mass spectrometry)
        Dynamics
        Physical constants
        Metaphysics
        Realism
        Whole & parts (Philosophy)
        Center of mass
      sug:
        subj:
          Additivity (Mass spectrometry)
          Dynamics
          Physical constants
          Metaphysics
          Realism
          Whole & parts (Philosophy)
          Center of mass
      keyword:
        cantidades
        center of mass
        centro de masa
        explicación metafísica
        mereología
        mereology
        metafísica
        metaphysical explanation
        metaphysics
        quantities
        cantidades
        centro de masa
        explicación metafísica
        mereología
        metafísica
      ab:
        I present an argument against the view that the additivity of mass (i.e., the property according to which a composite object's mass is the "sum" of its parts') is metaphysically independent of dynamical laws governing massive bodies. In particular, taking additivity to be independent of dynamics commits you to widespread unexplained correlations between the mass properties of composites and the dynamic behavior of massive bodies. The second half of the paper extends this explanatory worry, showing that the very same considerations apply to aspects of mass's quantitative structure. This gives rise to a new and powerful objection to certain influential theories about the fundamental structure of physical quantities--most notably the magnitude realism of Peacocke (2019) and the second-order absolutist accounts defended by Mundy (1987) and Eddon (2013b).
        Presento un argumento en contra de la opinión de que la aditividad de masa (la propiedad según la cual la masa de un objeto compuesto es la "suma" de la de sus partes) es metafísicamente independiente de las leyes de la dinámica que gobiernan los cuerpos masivos. En particular, considerar a la aditividad como independiente de la dinámica nos compromete con correlaciones generalizadas no explicadas entre las propiedades de masa de los compuestos y el comportamiento dinámico de los cuerpos masivos. La segunda mitad del artículo amplía esta preocupación explicativa, mostrando que las mismas consideraciones se aplican a aspectos de la estructura cuantitativa de la masa. Esto da lugar a una nueva y poderosa objeción en contra de ciertas influyentes teorías acerca de la estructura fundamental de las cantidades físicas, en particular, el realismo de la magnitud de Peacocke (2019) y las explicaciones absolutistas de segundo orden defendidas por Mundy (1987) y Eddon (2013b).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Crítica is the property of Instituto de Investigaciones Filosoficas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Crítica
      holder: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosoficas
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N