Left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all‐cause mortality in HF patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Biventricular pacing (BVP) is the gold standard for achieving CRT, but about 30%–40% of patients do not respond to BVP‐CRT. Re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology Vol. 46; no. 5; pp. 432 - 440
Autores principales: Parlavecchio, Antonio, Vetta, Giampaolo, Caminiti, Rodolfo, Coluccia, Giovanni, Magnocavallo, Michele, Ajello, Manuela, Pistelli, Lorenzo, Dattilo, Giuseppe, Foti, Rosario, Carerj, Scipione, Della Rocca, Domenico Giovanni, Crea, Pasquale, Palmisano, Pietro
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell May2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=163742658&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 163742658
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01478389
        4F8
      jtl: Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
      issn: 01478389
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2023
      vid: 46
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        163742658
        162988028
        163742658
        163742658
        10.1111/pace.14700
        163742658
      ppf: 432
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Parlavecchio, Antonio
          Vetta, Giampaolo
          Caminiti, Rodolfo
          Coluccia, Giovanni
          Magnocavallo, Michele
          Ajello, Manuela
          Pistelli, Lorenzo
          Dattilo, Giuseppe
          Foti, Rosario
          Carerj, Scipione
          Della Rocca, Domenico Giovanni
          Crea, Pasquale
          Palmisano, Pietro
        affil: Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
          Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
          Heart Failure Therapy
          Heart Conduction System
          Human
          Systematic Review
          Meta Analysis
          Descriptive Statistics
          Hospitalization
          Confidence Intervals
          Medline
          Cochrane Library
      ab: Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all‐cause mortality in HF patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Biventricular pacing (BVP) is the gold standard for achieving CRT, but about 30%–40% of patients do not respond to BVP‐CRT. Recent studies showed that left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) provided remarkable results in CRT. Therefore, we conducted a meta‐analysis aiming to compare LBBP‐CRT versus BVP‐CRT in HF patients. Methods: We systematically searched the electronic databases for studies published from inception to December 29, 2022 and focusing on LBBP‐CRT versus BVP‐CRT in HF patients. The primary endpoint was HF hospitalization. The effect size was estimated using a random‐effect model as Risk Ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD). Results: Ten studies enrolling 1063 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to BVP‐CRT, LBBP‐CRT led to significant reduction in HF hospitalization [7.9% vs.14.5%; RR: 0.60 (95%CI: 0.39–0.93); p =.02], QRSd [MD: 30.26 ms (95%CI: 26.68–33.84); p <.00001] and pacing threshold [MD: −0.60 (95%CI: −0.71 to −0.48); p <.00001] at follow up. Furthermore, LBBP‐CRT improved LVEF [MD: 5.78% (95%CI: 4.78–6.77); p <.00001], the rate of responder [88.5% vs.72.5%; RR: 1.19 (95%CI: 1.07–1.32); p =.002] and super‐responder [60.8% vs. 36.5%; RR: 1.56 (95%CI: 1.27–1.91); p <.0001] patients and the NYHA class [MD: −0.42 (95%CI: −0.71 to −0.14); p <.00001] compared to BVP‐CRT. Conclusion: In HF patients, LBBP‐CRT was superior to BVP‐CRT in reducing HF hospitalization. Further significant benefits occurred within the LBBP‐CRT group in terms of QRSd, LVEF, pacing thresholds, NYHA class and the rate of responder and super‐responder patients.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N