Anarchie und Interkulturalität: Zur Aktualität Paul Feyerabends.
What has anarchy got to do with intercultural philosophy? In this essay I show how anarchist positions and theorems as they are developed within Paul Karl Feyerabend's (P. K. F.) philosophy can for one be understood as the fundamentals of every pluralistic or anti-transcendental philosophy and for a...
| Publicado en: | Polylog no. 48; pp. 113 - 133 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiener Gesellschaft fur interkulturelle Philosophie
Winter2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=163878306&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 163878306 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15606325 78BM jtl: Polylog issn: 15606325 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Winter2022 iid: 48 pid: 47581 pub: Wiener Gesellschaft fur interkulturelle Philosophie artinfo: ui: 163878306 ppf: 113 ppct: 20 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.6MB tig: atl: Anarchie und Interkulturalität: Zur Aktualität Paul Feyerabends. aug: au: BAUER, LEONHARD su: Critical analysis Scientific method Philosophy of science Philosophers Motivation (Psychology) Common sense Anarchism sug: subj: Critical analysis Scientific method Philosophy of science Philosophers Motivation (Psychology) Common sense Anarchism keyword: anarchy humanism intercultural philosophy Paul Feyerabend philosophy of science post-colonial philosophy ab: What has anarchy got to do with intercultural philosophy? In this essay I show how anarchist positions and theorems as they are developed within Paul Karl Feyerabend's (P. K. F.) philosophy can for one be understood as the fundamentals of every pluralistic or anti-transcendental philosophy and for another that they can be used as a motivational source for legitimizing the basis of intercultural philosophy. The latter consists inter alia of the critical analysis of one's own tradition's criteria for evaluating others resp. the critical analysis of the practice of insinuating values on groups who »think differently« as well as the systematically underrepresented use of common-sense thought. I demonstrate that P. K. F., an almost forgotten Austrian philosopher, manages to anti-systematically introduce a variety of different philosophical criticisms. These focus primarily on the often-unquestioned disconnection between scientific method and humanistic values. I show how P. K. F. establishes an anarchistic way of arguing for one's beliefs, without having to commit to certain logical consequences of one's propositions. Lastly, I elaborate three entwined solutions by P. K. F. concerning philosophical problems such as the anticipation of the possible, learning and unity resp. the problem of universal conditions for understanding others. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: German refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Polylog is the property of Wiener Gesellschaft fur interkulturelle Philosophie and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Polylog holder: Wiener Gesellschaft fur interkulturelle Philosophie dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|