On automorphism criteria for comparing amounts of mathematical structure.

Wilhelm (Forthcom Synth 199:6357–6369, 2021) has recently defended a criterion for comparing structure of mathematical objects, which he calls Subgroup. He argues that Subgroup is better than SYM ∗ , another widely adopted criterion. We argue that this is mistaken; Subgroup is strictly worse than SY...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 201; no. 6; pp. 1 - 15
Autores principales: Barrett, Thomas William, Manchak, J. B., Weatherall, James Owen
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=163935773&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 163935773
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2023
      vid: 201
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        163935773
        10.1007/s11229-023-04186-3
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 278KB
      tig:
        atl: On automorphism criteria for comparing amounts of mathematical structure.
      aug:
        au:
          Barrett, Thomas William
          Manchak, J. B.
          Weatherall, James Owen
        affil:
          Department of Philosophy, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
          Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of California, Irvine, USA
      sug:
      keyword:
        Equivalence
        Structure
        Symmetry
      ab: Wilhelm (Forthcom Synth 199:6357–6369, 2021) has recently defended a criterion for comparing structure of mathematical objects, which he calls Subgroup. He argues that Subgroup is better than SYM ∗ , another widely adopted criterion. We argue that this is mistaken; Subgroup is strictly worse than SYM ∗ . We then formulate a new criterion that improves on both SYM ∗ and Subgroup, answering Wilhelm’s criticisms of SYM ∗ along the way. We conclude by arguing that no criterion that looks only to the automorphisms of mathematical objects to compare their structure can be fully satisfactory.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N