Cracks that Let the Light in: Collective Reflections on Integrating Lived Experience of Psychosis in Research and Policy in the Context of a Global Commission.

Within psychiatric research fields, there has been a marked uptick of interest in service user involvement in recent years. Nevertheless, it is often unclear how robust or impactful common forms of inclusion are, and the extent to which they have included individuals with psychosis. Using collective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Community Mental Health Journal Vol. 59; no. 5; pp. 819 - 826
Autores principales: Lee, Ying Ying, Buyanga, Musa, Mehta, Akriti, Omowunmi, Olayinka Aturu, Ryan, Grace, Sunkel, Charlene, Vasquez, Alberto, Jones, Nev
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=163936842&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 163936842
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00103853
        CMH
      jtl: Community Mental Health Journal
      issn: 00103853
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2023
      vid: 59
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        163936842
        10.1007/s10597-023-01118-w
      ppf: 819
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 765KB
      tig:
        atl: Cracks that Let the Light in: Collective Reflections on Integrating Lived Experience of Psychosis in Research and Policy in the Context of a Global Commission.
      aug:
        au:
          Lee, Ying Ying
          Buyanga, Musa
          Mehta, Akriti
          Omowunmi, Olayinka Aturu
          Ryan, Grace
          Sunkel, Charlene
          Vasquez, Alberto
          Jones, Nev
        affil:
          Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Buangkok, Singapore
          SUCCEED Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe, South Africa
          SUCCEED Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria
          Department of Methodology, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
          Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
          Global Mental Health Peer Network, Paarl Western Cape, South Africa
          Sociedad y Discapacidad, Lima, Peru
          Centre for Inclusive Policy, Geneva, Switzerland
          School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
          Pittsburgh, United States
      su:
        Policy sciences
        Psychiatry
        Group identity
        Mental health
        Human research subjects
        Ethnology research
        Population geography
        Experience
        Attitude (Psychology)
        Psychoses
        Practical politics
        Patient participation
        Cultural pluralism
        Patient selection
      sug:
        subj:
          Policy sciences
          Psychiatry
          Group identity
          Mental health
          Human research subjects
          Ethnology research
          Population geography
          Experience
          Attitude (Psychology)
          Psychoses
          Practical politics
          Patient participation
          Cultural pluralism
          Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
          Patient selection
      keyword:
        Co-production
        Global Mental Health
        Lived Experience
        Participatory Research
        Psychosis
        Service User Involvement
        User-Led Research
        Co-production
        Global Mental Health
        Lived Experience
        Participatory Research
        Psychosis
        Service User Involvement
        User-Led Research
      ab: Within psychiatric research fields, there has been a marked uptick of interest in service user involvement in recent years. Nevertheless, it is often unclear how robust or impactful common forms of inclusion are, and the extent to which they have included individuals with psychosis. Using collective auto-ethnography, this paper describes the experiences of 8 academic and non-academic members of the 'lived experience' and participatory research workgroup of a global psychosis Commission and our navigation of power and power hierarchies, differences in background and training, and multiple vectors of identity, diversity, and privilege. We conclude that the realities of "involvement" are much messier, more fraught, and less intrinsically empowering than often signaled in calls for involvement and co-production. We nevertheless stress the power of collective dialogue and support—between and among a pluralistic group—and of honesty and transparency about challenges, barriers, and the colonial underpinnings and geopolitics of global mental health.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N