A Survey of U.S. Audiologists' Usage of and Attitudes Toward Otoacoustic Emissions.
Purpose: Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) provide information on outer hair cell function and have multiple clinical applications. Two types of OAEs, transient-evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) and distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs), are currently utilized in clinical practice. However, it remains unknown how confiden...
| Published in: | American Journal of Audiology Vol. 32; pp. 417 - 432 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | research Journal Article |
| Published: |
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Jun2023
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=164040718&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 164040718 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10590889 5KS jtl: American Journal of Audiology issn: 10590889 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2023 vid: 32 pid: 42 pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association place: Rockville, Maryland artinfo: ui: 164040718 164040718 164040718 10.1044/2023_AJA-22-00096 164040718 ppf: 417 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: A Survey of U.S. Audiologists' Usage of and Attitudes Toward Otoacoustic Emissions. aug: au: Mertes, Ian B. Marquess, Ali affil: Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign sug: subj: Audiologist Attitudes United States Otoacoustic Emissions, Evoked Utilization Otoacoustic Emissions, Evoked Methods Human Surveys United States Treatment Outcomes Descriptive Statistics Decision Making, Clinical Hair Cells ab: Purpose: Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) provide information on outer hair cell function and have multiple clinical applications. Two types of OAEs, transient-evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) and distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs), are currently utilized in clinical practice. However, it remains unknown how confident U.S. clinicians are in performing and interpreting TEOAEs and DPOAEs. Additionally, the extent to which U.S. audiologists incorporate OAEs for different clinical applications and populations has not been thoroughly investigated. To fill these gaps in knowledge, this study characterized the attitudes toward and usage of TEOAEs and DPOAEs in a sample of U.S. audiologists. Method: This study utilized an online survey distributed to U.S. audiologists through multiple channels from January to March 2021. A total of 214 completed surveys were included in the analysis. Results were analyzed descriptively. Associations between variables and comparisons between users of DPOAEs only and users of TEOAEs and DPOAEs were also examined. Results: DPOAEs were reportedly utilized more frequently and with greater confidence than TEOAEs. The most common clinical application of both OAE types was a cross-check. Significant associations were found between responses to DPOAE questions and the clinician's setting and patient age. There were some significant differences between users of DPOAEs only and users of TEOAEs and DPOAEs. Conclusions: Results suggest that U.S. audiologists utilize OAEs for multiple clinical purposes and that there are appreciable differences in terms of attitudes toward and usage of DPOAEs versus TEOAEs. Future work could investigate the reasons that underlie these differences to further improve clinical implementation of OAEs. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|