Promoting self‐determination of persons with severe or profound intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta‐analysis.

People with severe or profound intellectual disabilities (IDs) are believed to experience low levels of self‐determination, which negatively affects their quality of life. This systematic review describes existing interventions aimed to support self‐determination or components thereof and synthesise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Vol. 67; no. 7; pp. 589 - 630
Autores principales: Kuld, P. B., Frielink, N., Zijlmans, M., Schuengel, C., Embregts, P. J. C. M.
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jul2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=164115809&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 164115809
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09642633
        EUL
      jtl: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
      issn: 09642633
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2023
      vid: 67
      iid: 7
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        164115809
        163624162
        164115809
        164115809
        10.1111/jir.13036
        164115809
      ppf: 589
      ppct: 41
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Promoting self‐determination of persons with severe or profound intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta‐analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Kuld, P. B.
          Frielink, N.
          Zijlmans, M.
          Schuengel, C.
          Embregts, P. J. C. M.
        affil: Department of Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Intellectual Disability
          Autonomy
          Persons with Disabilities Psychosocial Factors
          Self Concept
          Human
          Systematic Review
          Meta Analysis
          Descriptive Statistics
          Embase
          Medline
          Cochrane Library
          PubMed
          Psycinfo
          CINAHL Database
          Funding Source
      ab: People with severe or profound intellectual disabilities (IDs) are believed to experience low levels of self‐determination, which negatively affects their quality of life. This systematic review describes existing interventions aimed to support self‐determination or components thereof and synthesises evidence on the interventions' effects. Eight databases were searched, turning in 76 articles for the final inclusion. The studies included 631 people with severe or profound IDs of whom 81% had multiple disabilities. The studies had quantitative (k = 63), qualitative (k = 7) and mixed study designs (k = 6). Sample sizes ranged from 1 to 95 and a study quality index ranged from 40% to 100%. While many studies included several self‐determination components and intervention elements, overall, 53 studies focused on the self‐determination components choice making, independence and problem solving. Other studies included increased assistance (k = 14); engagement in meaningful activities and relationships (k = 10); community and societal participation (k = 5); supporting the basic psychological needs autonomy, competence and relatedness (k = 4); individuality and dignity (k = 3); supportive decision‐making (k = 2); self‐advocacy (k = 2); and motivation (k = 1). Intervention elements included technology (k = 33); multiple‐component training packages, goal setting, empowerment tactics and applied behaviour principles (k = 17); training of caretakers (k = 17); changes in policies and living arrangements (k = 9); supporter responsiveness (k = 1); drama therapy and storytelling (k = 1); electrical wheelchair training (k = 1); joint painting procedure (k = 1); youth advocacy project (k = 1); and multiliteracies training (k = 1). Reflecting the heterogeneity of the field, only four studies tested a similar intervention for this population and were eligible for the meta‐analysis, which combined showed a small effect size of 2.69. Further research is needed to explore relationships between individuals with severe or profound IDs and their relatives and health care professionals and create supportive environments that meet their basic psychological needs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N