Impact of malnutrition management elearning module on GPs’ knowledge: a pilot study.

Background: Malnutrition is underdiagnosed in primary care. GPs are key healthcare contacts for older adults at risk of protein-energy malnutrition; however, lack of knowledge and confidence in its diagnosis and treatment is often reported. Aim: To evaluate the impact of a bespoke online education m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BJGP Open Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
Autores principales: Geraghty, Aisling A., Castro, Patricia Dominguez, Reynolds, Ciara M. E., Browne, Sarah, Bourke, Frank, Bradley, Catriona, Finnigan, Karen, Clarke, Sarah, Clyne, Barbara, Bury, Gerard, Perrotta, Carla, Kennelly, Sharon, Corish, Clare A.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners Mar2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Malnutrition is underdiagnosed in primary care. GPs are key healthcare contacts for older adults at risk of protein-energy malnutrition; however, lack of knowledge and confidence in its diagnosis and treatment is often reported. Aim: To evaluate the impact of a bespoke online education module on GP malnutrition knowledge and management. Design & setting: A prospective pre—post pilot study with 23 GPs and eight GP trainees in the Republic of Ireland. Method: The module included units on the following: ‘malnutrition definition, prevalence, and latest evidence’; ‘identifying malnutrition in clinical practice’; ‘food-first advice’; ‘reviewing malnutrition’; and ‘oral nutritional supplements’. Participant knowledge was measured using a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) before and after the module (n = 31), and 6 weeks following completion (n = 11). Case studies assessing identification and management of malnutrition were evaluated by a clinical specialist dietitian with expertise in managing malnutrition. Changes in assessment performance were calculated using paired t-tests. Acceptability was evaluated using a questionnaire. Results: Post-training, 97% of GPs increased MCQ scores from baseline (+25%, P<0.001), with the greatest improvement in ‘identifying malnutrition in clinical practice’ (mean increase 47%, P<0.001). Eleven GPs completed the 6-week MCQ with scores remaining significantly higher than baseline (mean increase 15%, P = 0.005); ‘identifying malnutrition in clinical practice’ remained the most highly scored (mean increase 40%, P<0.001). Seventeen GPs completed the case studies; 76% at baseline and 88% post-module correctly calculated malnutrition risk scores. Appropriate malnutrition management improved for 47% of GPs after module completion. Conclusion: This e-learning module improved malnutrition knowledge, with good short-term retention in a small cohort. Development of online evidence-based nutrition education may improve GP nutrition care.