Exploring Criteria for the Translation of Traditional Knowledge Within Contemporary Clinical Practice, Research, Policy, and Education: A Stakeholder Forum.
Background: The 2018 Declaration of Astana identifies traditional knowledge (TK) as one of the drivers for strengthening primary health care systems through the use of technology (traditional medicines) and knowledge and capacity building (traditional practitioners). While TK underpins both traditio...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Integrative & Complementary Medicine Vol. 29; no. 6/7; pp. 348 - 361 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Jun/Jul2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=164221486&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 164221486 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 27683605 MX2I jtl: Journal of Integrative & Complementary Medicine issn: 27683605 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun/Jul2023 vid: 29 iid: 6/7 pid: 1365 pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. place: New Rochelle, New York artinfo: ui: 164221486 164221486 164221486 10.1089/jicm.2022.0683 164221486 ppf: 348 ppct: 13 formats: tig: atl: Exploring Criteria for the Translation of Traditional Knowledge Within Contemporary Clinical Practice, Research, Policy, and Education: A Stakeholder Forum. aug: au: Steel, Amie Foley, Hope Bugarcic, Andrea Wardle, Jon Boyd, Hannah Breakspear, Ian Carlton, Anne-Louise Cope, Greg Dua, Kamal Greenway, Patricia Redmond, Rebecca Hawrelak, Jason Shukla, Naveen Adams, Jon affil: Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia. sug: subj: Integrative Medicine Professional Knowledge Attitude of Health Personnel Evaluation Stakeholder Participation Medicine, Traditional Implementation Science Medical Practice, Evidence-Based Primary Health Care Human Funding Source Australia Descriptive Research Qualitative Studies Purposive Sample Snowball Sample Thematic Analysis Videoconferencing Field Notes Data Analysis Software Information Resources Triangulation Intellectual Property Patient Centered Care Communication Interprofessional Relations ab: Background: The 2018 Declaration of Astana identifies traditional knowledge (TK) as one of the drivers for strengthening primary health care systems through the use of technology (traditional medicines) and knowledge and capacity building (traditional practitioners). While TK underpins both traditional practice and the use of traditional medicines, facilitating the use of TK in contemporary health care systems has been difficult to achieve. The aim of this study was to identify key factors related to the translation of TK into contemporary settings to help establish tools to support the knowledge translation process. Methods: This study used World Café methodology to collect the observations, ideas, and perspectives of experts who use TK in their practice. These experts (n = 9) were from a variety of contexts, including clinical practice, research, education, policy, and consumer advocacy, participated in the 1-day event. Data were collected into NVivo 12 software and analyzed using inductive-deductive thematic analysis. Results: Thematic analysis identified five themes: the need to define the elements required for critical evaluation of sources of TK as evidence, the importance of applying a tradition-centric lens when translating TK for contemporary use, the need to bridge gaps between TK and its contemporary applications, the value of critically evaluating the TK translation process itself, and the recognition of traditions as living systems. Taken together, the themes showed holistic interpretation of the translation process that incorporates critical analysis of the TK itself and accountable, transparent, and ethical processes of translation that consider safety, socioeconomical and intellectual property impacts of TK in contemporary use. Conclusions: Stakeholders identified TK as a valid and important source of evidence that should guide practice in a range of contemporary settings (e.g., policy and clinical practice), and outlined important consideration for critiquing, evaluating, communicating, and using TK within these settings. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|